THE bourgeoning problems of Tamil Nadu fishermen have very few takers in the
State and the country. Chennai seems to be far from
Nagapattinam,Ramanathapuram, Thuthukudi or Kanyakumari, the hub of fishing
activity in the State and New Delhi is almost a distant planet from there.
Those in the mandarins of power, instead of solving the problems of the
fishermen, are asking them to change their profession, something that is hard
for them to accept. Tamil Nadu fishermen's demands have been put up in a
42-point charter, which includes implementation of the Murari Committee
recommendations.
Among other things it wants, formulation of proper marine
fishing regulations in the exclusive economic zone, a savings-cum-relief
scheme for fishermen, subsidised fuel and withdrawal of the Aquaculture
Authority Bill by the Centre. The fishing regulations are also one of the
contentious issues, which they want to be repealed. As of now, the fishermen
are allowed to venture into the sea from 5 am to 9 pm for three days in a
week. Bad weather conditions keep them shore-bound for 45 days in a year. This
has led them to demand a financial aid, which they say, should be extended to
their women folk as well. They had taken these demands to the Prime Minister
who had promised them to accord all facilities to both the fishermen and their
women folk.
However, when it comes to implementations the approach
remains lukewarm.Tamil Nadu fishermen have also been demanding an extension of
the fishing time which the State Government had clamped down following
conflict between fishermen using mechanised boats and those in traditional
country boats and catamarans. Fishermen, using traditional method, demand that
mechanised boatmen should not be allowed to fish within three nautical miles
of the coast and the ban should be strictly implemented. They complain that
use of trawlers or mechanised boats has created havoc in the seabed destroying
its flora-fauna and marine life.
The fishermen also have been demanding restoration of their
fishing rights in Kachchativu Island. Under 1974 treaty, the island has gone
to Sri Lanka but since then remains a bone of contention between Tamil Nadu
and Sri Lanka. Tamil Nadu government quote archival sources to claim that the
island had been the propriety of Raja of Ramnad, which the Central Government
has unilaterally given to Sri Lanka. State Chief Minister Jayalalitha had even
vowed to retrieve the Island back by force if the negotiations fail.
Since time immemorial Tamil Nadu fishermen have been using
the Kachatheevu Island for resting and drying nets. The water around the
island is known for lobsters and fishermen halt in the island after laying
their nets to get back to coast after collecting their catch. The island is
also known for religious festivities in which Tamil Nadu fishermen have been
involved since antiquity.
On certain days of the year fishermen throng the island
with their families to worship at the St Anthony church. The church is revered
by the fishermen and a priest from Ramnad goes there to conduct regular mass.
Since 1980s Sri Lankan navy patrol has reportedly started
objecting to the Indian fishermen fishing near Kachatheevu Island. The Sri
Lankan navy round-up these fishermen and take them for imprisonment. Related
to this is the issue of frequent detention of fishermen by the Sri Lankan navy
for alleged straying into the Sri Lankan waters. Earlier, the Tamil Nadu
fishermen were asked to return but since the ethnic conflict conflagrated in
the island, they
became suspect LTTE sympathisers and were shot at. Over hundred fishermen have
lost their lives in such shootings by the Sri Lankan Navy. Even though
shooting incidents have stopped since the beginning peace talks between the
LTTE and the Sri Lankan government, there is no respite to the Indian
fishermen from detention and torture.
Protesting the atrocities of the Lankan fishermen, a relay
demonstration was held in Rameswaram recently where the fishermen charged the
Central and state government of adopting a callous attitude. Chief Minister
Jayalalithaa had written several times to Prime Minister Vajpayee seeking his
intervention to find a permanent solution to this regular standoff.
Recently, a new dimension has been added into the arrest of
the Tamil Nadu fishermen for straying into Sri Lankan waters. They instead of
being rounded by Sri Lankan Navy are first being held by the LTTE, who are
levying fine and penalties and then handing them over to the Sri Lankan
authorities. The fact is that LTTE has intensified its patrolling in the Palk
Bay. The fear is if this remains unchecked the Indian government has to
approach the LTTE soon for release of its fishermen.
The problem in the Pak Bay is overfishing and pollution
that has led to the depletion of the fishes and ruining of its marine life.
Fishing by mechanised trawler has further
accentuated the problem. Pearls, which were in plenty in and around the Gulf
of Mannar and Thoothukudi city in 1960s, have lost its sheen. The number of
oysters over the years has dwindled in this Pearl City and the age-old diving
profession is slowly dying a natural death.
Another issue, which concerns the Tamil Nadu fishermen, is
the grandiose Sethusamudram project linking the Palk Bay and Gulf of Mannar on
the East Coast by creating a shipping canal through the Rameswaram Island.
Green lobbies have questioned the environmental impact of the project since it
involves extensive dredging of the Pamban channel where coral fish abound. The
Sri Lankan Government has also communicated its opposition to the project
because of its perceived threat to the marine life in the territorial waters
along the Pamban Channel. A pre-feasibility study, carried out by the Union
Government, had established that the project is economically viable and
suggests that it will take into account the views of the environmentalists
while framing its final recommendations. The Government of Tamil Nadu has also
been pressing the Centre to take up this project on priority basis. However,
there is no clarity as to how much Sethusamudram project would help or affect
the fishermen. If one goes by the hype of the shipping activity that
Sethusamudram project may generate, it is clear that there may hardly be any
scope for efflorescent fishing activities taking place after that.