|
The Government cannot control its
spending. All its talk of tightening the belt, of austerity measures
and of bringing the economy on to an even keel is just that—talk. So,
it appears, if it cannot control its own expenditure, why should the
people of the country be allowed to save? And the message goes out.
Spend! Spend! Spend.
First, the 10th Credit Policy presented by the
Reserve Bank of India on October 10. As expected, it drove the bank
rate down further—to 6.25 per cent, the lowest in the last three
decades. The RBI is in a rut and fallen into one of the oldest (and,
many times, most dangerous trap): reduce the cost of money so that
capital spending expands with the resultant benefits trickling down to
the people. We have reiterated ad nauseum in these columns that
this strategy just does not work as regards the industrial sector in
today’s political and economic conditions in the country (see box).
However, what we are concerned with here is the
impact on personal savings. There was a time when a salaried person
who saved five lakh rupees was assured of a monthly income of Rs.
5,000 from that oldest and most secure instrument: a fixed deposit in
a bank. No more. Today, he’s lucky if he gets a return of even half
that amount on the same sum. When bank interest goes down, deposit
rates are the first to be slashed. This is imperative for survival of
the banks and not a malicious act against the public. The UTI
continued paying a dividend higher than its income allowed and
everybody knows what happened to it. It went bust. Fortunately, the
Government’s reputation was at stake and UTI was bailed out with
massive inputs of public funds (euphemism for the people’s tax money).
If it had been a private company, it would have been declared legally
bankrupt. If a fall in bank deposit rates is the immediate impact of a
cut in the bank rate, does that mean that industry, agriculture, you
and me, will be able to borrow at lower interest rates? No way! You
see, there is something called the Prime Lending Rate (PLR), the
minimum rate at which banks agree to benchmark their lending
strategies. This never goes down in proportion to the fall in deposit
rates. In fact, even if it is slightly reduced, banks are allowed to
charge rates over the PLR in line with their perception of the
borrowers’ creditworthiness. There is no upper limit to this band. The
Tatas, Birlas and Ambanis are wooed to take loans even below the PLR
but small businesses are charged the highest rates, and as for
personal loans, just sit down and calculate the interest on your car
loan on the total term of the loan and you’ll know what I’m talking
about.
It might be argued that while savings may become
unremunerative and cars are only for the well-to-do who can afford to
pay high interest rates, the interest rate on housing loans has been
cut drastically and, today, a person with a monthly income of even Rs.
10,000 can dream of owning a small house. You think so? Listen to
this. What the Credit Policy could not do, the Kelkar Committee Report
on Taxation seeks to do. It recommends that the interest exemption on
housing loans, which was given to boost the housing sector, be
completely removed! The only good news for potential house-owners is
that the Government is unlikely to accept this particular suggestion
as it would probably drive the last nail into its hopes for reviving
its sagging political fortunes. Remember, when the BJP lost in Delhi,
where did the party put the blame? On Yashwant Sinha’s "anti-people
budget."
The Kelkar Report goes after the individual
taxpayer with a vengeance. It wants the bank rate to be further
reduced to encourage capital spending, despite the lack of results
over the frequent reductions in the past and ignoring the further
attrition in savings rates that this would attract. It also wants to
scrap all tax breaks and exemptions.
The message from the Government is clear: "Spend!
Spend like there’s no tomorrow. You’ll end up broke like us but at
least you’ll have fun as long as the money lasts." That’s the only
alternative if interest returns on small savings become so inadequate
that a salaried person cannot hope to support himself on his life
savings. On the other hand, if a small businessman or salaried person
wants to save, his only viable option may soon be to buy gold and hide
it under his mattress and sleep on it, banking on capital appreciation
rather than interest returns. Back to the future! |