lthough
State Assembly elections in Madhya Pradesh are scheduled to take place
in November, preparations are already afoot to make this coming battle
of the hustings a religious warfare issue. The Hindu Jagran Manch is
demanding opening of the doors of a disputed 11th-century protected
monument—Bhojshala-Kamal Moula mosque in Dhar near Indore—for Hindus to
offer prayers daily while the Muslim organisations are terming the
demand as another assault on their religion. The Congress Party has
chipped in to damage the reputation of the BJP by levelling allegations
against no less a person than Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, that
he is a "beef-eater." In order to turn the religious tide which is
threatening to engulf him in the elections, the Congress Chief Minister
of the State, Digvijay Singh, is raising the demand for a ban on cow
slaughter.
Betraying
his anxiety over the possible tarnishing of his reputation further, the
Prime Minister told the Bharatiya Janata Parliamentary Party meeting to
get set to "defeat the nefarious designs of Digvijay Singh and company"
in Madhya Pradesh. "We have to be cautious and counter this with an
effective strategy especially in view of the coming Assembly elections,"
the Prime Minister said and called upon his party workers not to take
the hostile propaganda lying down. An angry Vajpayee reportedly
thundered at the meeting: "Political parties would do mischief in order
to raise their stock. But why were the BJP cadres silent and not
retaliating suitably to the charges against me and the party?"
Fearing a repetition in Madhya Pradesh of happenings
in Ayodhya, where the Babri Masjid was razed to the ground by kar sevaks
mobilised by Hindu fundamentalist organisations in 1992, the Muslim
clerics are not sitting mum. They are already shouting from the
housetops that there is no justification in undermining the status
quo according to which Muslims are allowed to offer prayers every
Friday and Hindus only once in a year on Basant Panchami day at the
disputed monument maintained as a protected site by the Archaeological
Survey of India. Voicing the opinion of the Muslim elite, N. Jamal
Ansari wrote in the Radiance News Weekly: "The BJP has started
talking about cultural nationalism without bothering to define it. In
the past it used certain terms like Indianisation, Hindutva, etc. to
capture power. All this is nothing but the downfall of our democratic
polity."
What shape events will take in Dhar with possible
repercussions all over the State will be clear only in the days to come.
But already the disputed Bhojshala-Kamal Moula mosque has witnessed
rioting and lathi-charges precipitated by a vain bid by the Hindu Jagran
Manch activists to storm the shrine and open its locks. When they were
not allowed to approach within 100 metres of the temple, they resorted
to pelting stones at the police. The police resorted to a lathi charge
and lobbed teargas shells. Two policemen and 22 Jagran Manch activists
were injured. Several shops in the town were set on fire. The police
arrested 150 Manch members including 50 women. Following the outbreak of
violence on February 18, the town wore a deserted look although there
was no curfew.
Now that fundamentalists have lit the communal fuse,
the violence seems to spreading in the State. Two persons were reported
killed, several injured and some buses set on fire in different parts of
the State in the fallout of the Bhojshala lathi charge by the police.
The BJP leader, Uma Bharati, called the State Chief Minister "a liar".
The BJP spokesman in New Delhi, Vijay Kumar Malhotra, attacked the State
Government for the lathi charge on people who had gone to Bhojshala to
offer prayers. The Congress issued a statement accusing the BJP of
trying to re-enact Gujarat in Madhya Pradesh where people had lived long
in communal harmony. There are charges and counter-charges by political
chieftains who have their eyes riveted on the outcome of the polls to be
held later this year.
Obviously, troubled and fearing that the Dhar
incidents may trigger communal warfare in the State, Chief Minister
Digvijay Singh said those trying to vitiate the prevailing atmosphere of
communal harmony in Madhya Pradesh would not be spared. He warned the
BJP that it would not be allowed to repeat "another Gujarat" where the
BJP had recently won the State Assembly election mainly due to the
near-total communal polarisation of the electorate. The Congress
President, Sonia Gandhi, provoked by the Hindu Jagran Manch tactics,
charged the Bharatiya Janata Party with misusing Hinduism to polarise
society. There is a lull in Madhya Pradesh now. But it looks like the
proverbial lull before the outbreak of a major communal storm. The
hardliner BJP activists at the moment are busy in swinging the
electorate in their favour in Himachal Pradesh where elections are due
to take place shortly. The hero of the BJP’s victory in Gujarat, Chief
Minister Narendra Modi, is occupied in using his tried and tested
slogans in other States to prepare ground for a BJP sweep in the entire
country. One of the most experienced and seasoned BJP leaders, Uma
Bharati, who is heading the party in Madhya Pradesh now, is formulating
her strategy and once she starts unleashing her thunder, it would not be
easy for Digvijay Singh to capture power for a third time in a row—he
had won the Assembly elections in the State twice earlier. Like Ayodhya,
which had been a major cause of dispute between Hindus and Muslims ever
since the Babri Masjid was built here in the 16th century, the Bhojshala
mosque complex had also been a source of tension between the two
communities for long. Rival claims over the monument provoked communal
clashes in 1944 and then again in 1984. In order to forestall trouble,
the Government decided to hand over custody of the monument to the
Archaeological Survey of India in 1952. Following protracted
negotiations, the ASI decided to declare the monument open to the public
on Friday for Namaz and once a year for Basant Panchami puja.
The root cause of the real problem in Dhar, just as
it is the case in Ayodhya and many other disputed sites in the country
today, is that the Hindu majority community in India, suppressed by
Muslim conquerors for long, put up with the sacrilege and denigration of
their holy places without much protest, for protest could only be
treated by past rulers as rebellion and result in nothing but their
summary trial leading to execution. Now the wounded Hindu psyche is
trying to reassert itself because the community feels free and, in a
parliamentary democracy, can prevail upon the minority by sheer numbers.
Although the Hindu wounded psyche might have remained a psychological
phenomenon, finding expression in writings against the erstwhile rulers
of India, the fundamentalist organisations are seizing the opportunity
to arouse the subconscious feeling against the minority community,
chiefly for electoral gains. As the outcome of the election results in
Gujarat demonstrated, the polarised majority can prevail over the
secular ideals that the founding fathers of the Indian Constitution had
hoped for to make India a beloved country of all faiths and religions.