cursory look at the finances of the Tourism Finance Corporation will
give a strong indication of the troubled times that the tourism
industry is facing. Its list of non-performing assets is growing and
many new hotels are on the list of properties to be auctioned to
recover bad debts. This position is expected to deteriorate further
in days to come unless immediate steps are taken to provide relief
to the industry in the forthcoming budget.
In the words of Dr. Vijay Kelkar, advisor to
Finance Minister Jaswant Singh, the industry has suffered from
neglect because it was treated as an industry serving the elite
instead of being accepted as a means to provide employment with the
highest multiplier effect. An indication how the industry has
suffered is obvious as the occupancy of hotel rooms, which stood at
71.1 per cent in 1996, fell to 50.1 per cent in 2001 and to 50.04
per cent in 2002. On top of it, if war breaks out in Iraq, the
industry will head for certain disaster.
The non-performing units are also suffering
because mergers and acquisitions are not easy in the hotel industry,
as transfer of losses is not permitted under the existing rules.
This facility is allowed in other industries and helps the financial
institutions in recovering their dues. The decline in traffic is
evident from the fact that while the number of tourists stood at
2.64 million in the year 2000, it fell to 2.51 in 2001 and in the
current year it has come down to 2.35.
With the declining fortunes of the industry,
provision for depreciation has come down to 10 per cent against 20
per cent which has been the norm so far. One way out of the current
crisis is that tourism should get the status of an export industry
as nearly 60 per cent of its earnings are in foreign exchange. This
can make a big difference to the industry, particularly in building
infrastructure. In the current set up, hotel groups concentrating on
tourist circuits have suffered the maximum as indicated by the
balance sheets. The groups like Taj and ITC, concentrating on
business travellers, have done reasonably well while the Oberois
which invested in luxury properties in tourist destinations have
reported the worst results.
The industry is hoping that Finance Minister
Jaswant Singh will come to their rescue in the forthcoming budget as
the Planning Commission as well as the Prime Minister have recently
looked at tourism favourably and are advising the States to
encourage it with a view to provide employment in remote areas. The
budget allocation of the Tourism Ministry is also expected to rise
considerably so that India could make a serious effort in becoming
an attractive destination in days to come. The biggest obstacle
facing the industry is the high incidence of taxation. For instance,
on representation by the industry the limit for expenditure tax has
been raised from Rs. 2,000 to Rs. 3,000. But instead of levying it
per person, it is now levied per room, which has increased its
incidence instead of reducing it. The overall incidence of taxation
on every rupee spent by a tourist is 30 to 40 per cent differing
from State to State. This compares very unfavourably with other
destinations in South East Asia where the impact of taxation is only
four to six per cent. In the case of China, the biggest player in
the tourism sector, there are no taxes at all.
The industry has been demanding that the Centre
and States should tax the tourism industry at one point only instead
of a multiplicity of taxes which not only pose a heavy burden on the
industry but also cause unnecessary harassment. Yet another sore
point is the imposition of luxury tax on food items, which forms one
third of the total expenditure by a tourist. The food items invite
sales tax plus luxury tax which make eating in hotels a real luxury.
Besides direct taxes, the other inputs on tourism are also heavily
taxed.
For instance, air travel in India is expensive
because aviation turbine fuel is sold to airlines at a huge premium
with a view to subsidise the sale of kerosene. The result is that
travel within India is more expensive as compared to foreign travel.
Any tourist wanting to visit Thiruvananthapuram from Delhi has to
shell out more than for a journey to Colombo or Bangkok. This
certainly is not an incentive for domestic tourism. It is as a
result of these policies that while countries like Malaysia,
Thailand and Sri Lanka have done well in tourism despite limited
attractions, India has remained a bad number.
In the words of British Tourism expert. Prof.
Christine Ennew, countries, through more innovative publicity and
marketing, have been able to attract tourists in large numbers while
India with its numerous attractions has not been able to make its
mark. The problems facing the Indian tourism industry have been
analysed in detail, but no action has been taken so far to correct
them. The result is that India is suffering not only in terms of
numbers but in its ability to attract tourists who have big purses.
At present, we attract a large number of
backpackers with limited spending power. who are prepared to
overlook shortcomings of infrastructure. The major shortcoming is
that the Indian Government and people have refused to see the
benefits of the tourism industry fully or realise its benefits.
There have been a few isolated efforts by States like Goa, Kerala
and Rajasthan, but a concentrated effort is yet to be undertaken.
One can hope that the Finance Minister will look
at the industry with sympathy in his new budget. He should help in
starting a programme of reconstruction. In the days to come, the
greater emphasis will be on development of regional tourism instead
of long haul traffic. One hopes that India will not be left behind
in this race as was the case when industry was hit after the
September 11, 2001 events and will have in place a crisis management
programme before the crisis really hits us.