|
|
 |
|
|

|
Pollution |
|
|
|
|
The Desecration of the Holy Rivers
|
|
Shibani Dasgupta
|
|
F or
both India’s holiest rivers the Yamuna and Ganga, despite millions of
rupees spent on their upkeep and purity, there seems no end to their
colossal pollution, with continuous discharge of millions of gallons of
waste water and effluents day after day.
Despite massive investments
running into crores of rupees, the two holiest rivers of India don’t
seem to get any cleaner – India may well be into the second phase of
Ganga and Yamuna Action Plan, but more than half the total waste water
discharged into the rivers remained untreated.
According to the latest report of
Central Pollution Control Board, a total of 8,250 million litres per day
(MLPD) of waste water is generated in the Ganga basin. But treatment
facilities are available for only 3,932 mlpd. Thus, more than half the
sewage generated in the Ganga Basin is discharged without any treatment,
into the country’s holy rivers.
Spread over an area of 861,404 sq
kilometers, the Ganga Basin covers the states of Uttaranchal, Uttar
Pradesh, Haryana, Delhi, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Bihar, Jharkhand and
West Bengal. The 233 towns and cities located in the area are the prime
contributors of the sewage discharge into the river. The report reveals
that the pollution into the river is not just direct but also through
the various tributaries and sub tributaries. Of the 8,250 mlpd, about
4,570 mlpd is discharged into the tributaries and sub tributaries.
Another 1,200 mlpd is disposed of on land and low-lying areas.
Sewage is the main cause of
pollution of the river. This entire problem is linked with the issue of
urbanization. The cities and towns located in the Ganga basin have been
growing at a fast rate, but the infrastructure of the area has been
unable to match this growth. The rise in the population has been
considerable compared to the development of infrastructure. Also, a lot
of the sewage load comes from the tributaries. The Yamuna river, which
flows into the Ganga, is the most polluted river in the country, points
out Central Pollution Control Board additional director R C Trivedi.
The Ganga Action Plan also did not
take into account the tremendous urban growth. The Ganga Action Plans
that came into effect in 1985 did not envisage the growth in population.
The first phase in the plan barely catered for about 850 mlpd of waste
water. But even that target was not achieved by the plan. Currently, the
sewage treatment capacity of 3,932 mlpd has been created under various
schemes. While 1882 mlpd treatment capacity have been created under the
Ganga Action Plan, 720 mlpd has been created under Yamuna Action Plan.
And about 2330 mlpd capacity has been created by the Delhi Government
for restoration of clean water in the Yamuna.
Attempting to bridge this vast gap
between waste water generation and treatment facilities / capacity,
provision of more treatment facilities has been planned under the Ganga
Action Plan Phase II and the National River Action Plan. According to
the CPCB report, an additional capacity of about 1,500 mlpd would be
created through this much touted plan.
Supreme Court's observation
on pollution
The situation at the Yamuna River
Basin has been so bad that the Supreme Court recently has to give its
observation that ‘it seemed that the government and its functionaries
had failed in their public duty towards the citizens of Capital of
India’. Despite all these years, they have not been able to provide even
C category water in the Yamuna the SC observed. Echoing the CPCB
observations, SC also found that the Yamuna from Wazirabad to Okhla
consisting the flood plains, seasonal pools and marshy areas has become
one of the most threatened riverine eco-systems of the world. And this
is despite a massive Rs 900 crores being pumped into it for sewage
treatment plants, common effluent treatment plants and other measures.
A visit to the affected areas in
and around Delhi on the river front will show, it is filthier than it
was a decade ago – that is when the project to clean up the river was
taken up. While Yamuna Action Plan I is over, and YAP II is being
implemented, the water looks blacker than before, and resembles the
colour of tar. The YAP coordinated by the Ministry of Environment and
Forests had to not only improve the quality of water along the 22
kilometres stretch of Delhi but also in the adjoining areas of Haryana
and Uttar Pradesh. In Delhi as well as the adjoining areas, all
unwarranted habits — encroachments, dumping of garbage, puja materials,
industrial effluents – have contributed to making this river a cesspool.
While the bio-chemical oxygen
demand (BOD) level should not be more than 3 mg per litre, it has gone
up to 18 mg, while dissolved oxygen level has come down to an alarming
zero, the ideal level being 5 mg per litre. While there is no flow of
water into the river, the huge quantity of untreated sewage flowing into
the river continues unabated. There are about 19 drains running into the
river. Sewage treatment management needs to be run effectively to stop
further deterioration of the situation. Even as Delhi, with a population
of over 13 million, produces abut 750 million gallons per day of waste
water which flows directly into the river in the form of biodegradable
matter like flowers, coconuts, bananas, the river is also recipient of
plastics, silver paper tinsel and plastic bags or bottles – the last
item being the most common and difficult to tackle.
Sewage treatment is a costly
affair – it costs about Rs 50 lakhs to treat a million litres per day of
sewage. There are 17 sewage treatment plants of which three are non
functional (April 05 figures). Plus, some 62,000 slums on the Yamuna
banks need to be relocated, out of which only 11,000 have been relocated
so far. The lack of flow of water is also a major problem as a large
chunk of the water is diverted by Haryana, before it enters Delhi.
People’s needs are more important is the argument given by that state
government. That argument opens another can of worms and forms the basis
of another set of political complications and inter-state relations.
In the bargain, the rivers suffer
and so do the population in the absence of a regulated usage pattern of
the available water. The prevailing conditions demand that an equitable
distribution system is put in place and the people themselves utilise
the facility of piped water judiciously. |
|