When it comes to disinvestments of
loss making public sector or reforms in insurance sector or paying
interest at market rates for deposits in the provident fund, the Left
gives little room to the Government and most of the time they have to
roll back their programmes. The latest victim of it is the oil sector
where prices have not been allowed to be raised even though the prices
of crude have touched above 50 dollars mark. The result is that the oil
sector, a bright spot in otherwise a dismal record in public sector, is
heading towards a disaster.
The latest results announced have
shown that IOC, the single largest entity in public sector has shown a
dip of thirty per cent in its profits. If the present trend continues,
it will not be long before it starts making losses. The same is true of
other public sector undertakings in oil sector like BP, HP and IBP. Even
at this stage, the Left is continuing to insist that prices of items
like Kerosene and diesel or LPG used for domestic cooking should not be
raised. The result is that oil sector is heading for serious trouble
while Ministers dealing with Finance, Oil and Commerce continue to plead
with Left leaders who have emerged as new Centre of power.
The result is that some very
unusual ideas have been floated to meet the problem created by the
Left’s insistence to keep the oil prices fixed while the international
prices continue to shoot up. If remedial action is not taken soon, the
burden of subsidising oil products will soon fall either on Government
which is struggling hard to balance its books or on oil companies by
moving them into the list of loss making units. One proposal is to cut
the drawback duty on exports of oil products to make up the deficit.
To say the least, this would be
remedy, which would be worse than the disease. For instance, it has to
be understood that principle of duty drawback is that no country can
afford to export its taxes while exporting its products. The exporters
of oil products are compensated only to the extent that they pay duty on
import of crude. This policy has the endorsement of international bodies
like WTO and is used widely to help the export drive. It is an accepted
norm that for export, raw materials should be available at international
prices.
In case this policy is given up
under pressure from Left, India could say goodbye to its dreams of
becoming a world hub for oil refining due to its strategic location. It
will also end the dream of present oil minister Mani Shankar Aiyer to
reduce the burden imposed on the country by oil imports by exporting in
turn the refining product. It was in this context, the Minister had told
the Parliament that he would like the public sector oil companies to
follow the example of private sector in exporting oil products. At
present, most of the exports are being done by private sector firms.
This also had the blessing of the Government as India has surplus
refining capacity in oil sector. It was a continuation of this policy
that oil minister was hoping to persuade Pakistan during his coming trip
to buy its diesel requirements from India, which will reach them easily
and at price and quality comparable with the best in world.
Yet another trial balloon floated
is that the refining units may be compelled under the Essential
Commodities Act to produce Kerosene and also sell the same at a price
lower than the cost of production. Besides the legal loopholes in such a
scheme, it would also bring back the days of license permit Raj with all
its consequences. In case, the Government is keen to produce Kerosene,
the best way will be to make it essential for all refineries to produce
certain quantity to meet national demand to create a level playing field
instead of punishing few selected refineries which have achieved success
in field of exports.
There is also a need to check
misuse of Kerosene. The use of this product for running auto rickshaws,
fishing trawlers and for adulterating diesel cannot be overstressed. The
real reason for it is no secret, the huge price differential in price of
Kerosene and diesel provides huge inducement for such activities. A time
has come when UPA leaders and NDA should seriously think of
collaborating to keep the process of reforms going as otherwise the
country is bound to suffer. Such cooperation is not easy as presence of
leaders like Mr George Fernandez in NDA and Mr Laloo Prasad Yadav in UPA
will not allow it, but if it does not happen there is serious threat of
Left stalling the reforms process and also put breaks on nation’s
progress.