Andhra
Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu has been unable to bring
around the People’s War Group to give up their ways of violence.
Though there had been two rounds of talks between the Andhra Pradesh
Government and People’s War Group (PWG) there is no sign of any
meeting ground. Both the sides, at their separate media briefings,
admitted that the discussions could not break any ice and were
limited to confidence building measures. The discussions were held
in the chambers of Commercial Taxes Minister K Vijayarama Rao, one
of the two government representatives, with the two PWG emissaries,
revolutionary writer Varavara Rao and Balladeer Gaddar.
It is extremely difficult to find a solution to
this vexed issue as the PWG is making demands that the government
can’t meet. The PWG representatives had laid down eight demands.
These included continuation of the armed struggle, even while the
dialogue process was on, and lifting of the ban on the outfit. As
both the demands are contradictory in nature, the government was
adamant that the issue of lifting the ban on the PWG could be
considered during the main course of discussions between the two
parties.
But the PWG representatives insisted that lifting
the ban and removing the list of names of those who carry rewards on
their heads would facilitate a conducive atmosphere for further
discussions. They added that the armed struggle was a part of the
PWG policy and the issue could not be a hindrance for considering
lifting of the ban on the outfit. "Armed struggle is only a part of
the political principles of the People’s War, which is a national
party. It could not be shown as a pretext for imposing a ban on the
organisation," Varavara Rao said.
The government has made it clear that as long as
armed squads continued to move around in the rural areas terrorising
people and no declaration came forth from the PWG on giving up the
armed struggle, lifting the ban on the outfit would be difficult.
Varavara Rao insisted that the Sri Lankan
Government decided to lift the ban on LTTE though the latter
continued to swear by armed struggle. But the argument was rejected
by Rao and Sitaram. The ministers contended that lifting of the ban
was not possible unless the PWG laid down arms.
Analysts feel that the ban would mean nothing if
both the sides exercise restraint and desisted from violence. Though
the scale of operations by the PWG and the police has come down
significantly in recent weeks, a sort of war of words is going on
between the two sides with mutual tirade assuming nastier
proportions.. Certainly, the two warring sides cannot adopt
belligerent posturing and, at the same time, hope to carry on with a
dialogue to find a lasting solution to a protracted issue. Both the
government and the PWG claim to work for the people’s welfare, the
State’s all-round development and peace and order in society.
Moreover, the PWG does not trust the government
and the police. Mutual trust and confidence are important factors to
make the talk fruitful. The discussions held between the party were
totally confined to the PWG’s ‘‘protest’’ against the exchange of
fire at Inaole village in Mahaboobnagar on June 5, and the killing
of a Jana Shakti extremist and a dacoit in Guntur district in the
past two days by the police. ‘‘A power group, consisting of police
officials and encouraged by the political leadership, is out to
thwart the negotiations,’’ said Varavara Rao. He, along with Gaddar,
accused the police of trying to vitiate the atmosphere while the PWG
had kept its word of ‘‘ceasefire’’ since January 10. The PWG
representatives shouted slogans against the encounters, while
entering the secretariat, the venue of the discussions.
The government, however, defended the police
action claiming that the talks were initiated to find a permanent
solution to the issue but at the same time, it had to maintain law
and order. Observers feel that the Andhra Pradesh government’s
decision to hold talks with the Naxalite group without involving the
Centre and other Naxal-affected State governments, may end up as a
futile exercise. If the Andhra government is really sincere in
bringing an end to the Naxalite problem and wants peace, it should
bring both the Centre and all the extremist-affected states and the
joint coordination committee, formed to tackle the vexatious
problem, on a single platform and begin talks with the PWG.
Although developmental forces dub Naxalism as
anti-national, experts say it is a politico-ideological and
socio-economic problem, which needed to be addressed with
sensitivity. The AP government is often criticised for taking it as
a law and order problem. The Naxalite movement has its origin in the
peasant’s struggle against landlords and zamindars and they don’t
believe in political democracy. The PWG has often been accused of
resorting to mindless massacres, which are far divorced from its
avowed original objectives. On the other hand, the police have time
and again been charged with giving a go-by to legal methods in
tackling the problem and eliminating extremists and PWG sympathisers
in what were widely believed to be fake encounters. It goes to the
credit of the Committee of Concerned Citizens (CCC) comprising
former civil servants, academics and other intellectuals a year ago
that the two sides have at least agreed to begin a constructive
dialogue. As the next round of talks is to be held on June 20, it
would be interesting to see how far the Andhra Pradesh government
would be successful in curbing the terror.