| |
Though
Saddam Hussein´s regime has crumbled and a new historic move to
introduce a democratic system of government is underway, it will be
interesting to reflect on India’s reaction to this U. S. war on Iraq.
President Bush’s war on Iraq triggered a dilemma in
the top political echelons of India, because the relations between
India and Iraq had been cordial and Saddam Hussein, despite being head
of a Muslim state, had always been supportive of the Indian stand on
Kashmir. This made it difficult for the government and even some other
rightist polity of the country to support the war on Iraq. Moreover,
the Government of India has gone by the principle that the Bush
administration had gone against international law by ordering its
forces to forcibly change the regime of another sovereign country—a
most disturbing aspect of a bad precedent. Still, by all means, the
reaction of the government as well as of the BJP, the ruling party,
have not been that severe and overbearing. Moreover, by and large,
most of the people in the streets of India praised the U. S. strong
retaliation against the 9/11 terrorists attack on the WTC as compared
to India’s feeble reaction against the rampant cross-border terrorism
unleashed by Pakistan since 1989. Notwithstanding India’s stand on
this issue, it is imperative also to grasp the American viewpoint as
to why Capitol Hill is aggressively retaliating against the rising
forces of terrorism. America is a strong country, which is unrivalled
in protecting her economic and strategic interests. The cornerstone of
U. S. policy has been to ruthlessly guard these dual interests. The
9/11 terrorist attack not only devastated the economy of the country,
but also created terror in the minds of the people: daily listening to
the warnings of the Attorney-General about the possibility of similar
attacks on public and government institutions. And then the terrorists
attack did not target only the WTC, but there was also a desperate bid
to destroy the White House and the Pentagon, the most powerful and
sacred institutions of the country. With further threats daily
emanating from Osama bin Laden, the U. S. A. took it as an act of
aggression and a grave threat to the very foundation of her system of
governance. The tactics of the terrorists to slowly bleed America as
has been happening with India for the last more than a decade could
not be tolerated by a strong country like the
U. S. A.. It is a country which puts a million dollar reward on the
head of the killer of any one of her nationals on duty. It is not a
pacifist but a dynamic country, which relentlessly targets her enemies
until she decimates them to uphold her strong image as the most
powerful country of the world.
After destroying the Taliban regime in Afghanistan,
the U. S. A. has been seriously looking to target other flash spots
which could be of danger to the country. Saddam Hussein, being a
bitter enemy of the U. S. A., could form an important base similar to
that of Afghanistan in harbouring and clandestinely supporting
terrorist forces against America. Most probably, the CIA had already
acquired considerable evidence to that account. On top of this, Saddam
Hussein had been playing devious games and was not honestly following
the sanctions slapped on Iraq by the U. N.. Though it is difficult to
justify the attack launched by the U. S. A. and its allies on Iraq
without the sanction of the
U. N., it is also impossible to justify Saddam Hussein’s invasion of
Kuwait in 1991. Saddam committed an unprovoked invasion on a smaller
country and perpetuated unknown brutalities against the people of
Kuwait, compelling the U. S. A. to intervene with the full support of
the free world. It was easy for the U. S. A. at that time to walk into
Iraq and change the regime then and there. But America stopped short
of slapping some sanctions on Iraq under the aegis of the U. N., which
Saddam Hussein never honestly complied with. According to
knowledgeable reports, U. S. troops in Iraq have recently found 11
mobile labs buried south of Baghdad capable of biological and chemical
uses.
On top of this, Saddam’s regime was totally
authoritarian and there was no place for any freedom of speech or
semblance of public participation. It was a country ruled by Saddam
and his two sons at their will. Colin Powell’s recent talk to focus on
Kashmir, after handling Iraq, should not be misconstrued by India. The
U. S. A. is fully aware that Pakistan is today the epicentre of
terrorism, where Osama bin Laden and thousands of Al Qaeda fighters
are hiding.
Now, it is time for India to co-operate with
America in the reconstruction of Iraq and also impress on her
vehemently to next target Pakistan with a similar pre-emptive
diplomatic if not military campaign, to strike a deadly blow to
Pakistan’s terrorist-producing machines, the training camps, which are
responsible for exporting terrorism to other parts of the world as
well as bleeding the Indian republic. |