oad
accidents and the consequent loss of life, limb and property are
rising alarmingly in India. And there are no strong force, political
interests or profit motives-favouring the growth of knowledge of
road safety and its incorporation into practice. It is in this
context that our insurance companies, who also underwrite vehicle
insurance, should be persuaded to play a more effective role in road
safety. All the more, because they enjoy more or less a business
monopoly. Anyway, their profitability depends not only on raising
premiums but on cutting down on automobile accidents.
Till now, these companies have been content with
putting up some hoardings against drunken driving, and giving a
marginal premium rebate to members of recognised automobile
associations. Surely, there is scope for them to do much more in
this field. A few measures that suggest themselves are mentioned
here.
Insurance companies should operate a scheme under
which drivers who pass the test of advanced driving are given
substantial rebate in premium, as much as 20 per cent. The Institute
of Advanced Motoring in the U. K. can serve as a model. This
voluntary non-profit-earning institute, founded in 1956, has
evaluated the driving standards of thousands who present themselves
for its advanced tests at various conveniently located centres. The
test fee is currently 25 pounds. Individuals who pass get a
significant rebate in their car insurance premiums. Studies have
revealed that those who passed have a 25 per cent better accident
record on an average.
Perhaps it would be better if our public sector
insurance companies came together to set up such an institute of
their own. It can gradually develop facilities for testing at
various State capitals. Individuals passing the test (a
non-refundable entry fee for the test) can enjoy a substantial
rebate in auto premium. And successful ones would be required to
undergo a repeat test every 10 years. The entry fee will discourage
frivolous applicants as well as meet a part of the test costs. The
U. K. Institute has drawn up a manual for advanced motoring. Our
proposed institute can adopt it, with modifications appropriate to
indigenous
conditions.
The scheme should prove an eminently practical
step in raising driving standards throughout the country. The
Certificate of Advanced Driving, if it begins to gain high
credibility, will not only be attractive for its monetary benefits
but also as a prestige symbol when displayed through a
sticker—people take pride in being recognised as good drivers.
Running one or more such institutes will yield valuable information
to insurance companies about various aspects of road safety.
Another interesting idea is to offer cheaper
insurance to motorists who pass an eye test (including a test of
night blindness) conducted by the insurance companies. It is common
knowledge that many of our licensed drivers—and that includes
professional drivers of buses, trucks, taxis and autorickshaws—suffer
from eyesight deficiencies and are thus prone to road accidents.
Night blindness, known as low-luminance myopia, is estimated to
afflict some 30 to 40 per cent of our drivers. This condition,
however, remains undetected in our usual eyesight tests for drivers.
No wonder the death rate on roads is three to four times higher
during darkness than in daylight. Now a simple test for the
condition has been devised. Even corrective lenses can now be
prescribed with an anti-reflection, zirconium coating. All in all, a
proper eye test pays dividends.
Our industry which builds bodies for trucks, buses, vans, and
autorickshaws often does not observe the needed standards of safety.
One reason is the mushrooming of small units, usually without the
requisite technical expertise and inspection procedures. Passenger
cabins may be left weak or the seats inside a bus not properly
secured. Of course, it is the job of the licensing authorities to
approve these vehicles. But insurance companies can also develop
expertise on the subject. And in the light of their inspections,
reward safer construction and penalise unsafe ones through variation
in the premium. For example, heavy vehicles with more forgiving
fronts could be rewarded and so also motorcycles with leg guards.
And our insurance companies can combine to commission booklets on
safe driving. These should not just routinely reproduce the traffic
regulations but attempt to explain in a lively manner the rationale
behind many of these regulations, and what are the common causes of
accidents. Such booklets (preferably well illustrated) can be
separate for professionals, private owners, autorickshaw drivers and
drivers of two-wheelers and given at a nominal cost when a new
insurance policy is issued for a vehicle. Insurance companies can
well report that for them motor insurance is already a losing
proposition and they would not like to be burdened with extra
expense and responsibility. Some of their losses may well be due to
the malpractice flourishing in auto insurance; padded bills of
workshops, with the connivance of corrupt company staff and some
unscrupulous clients. These call for special remedies.