he
election in Maldives is due in 2003 and in all likelihood President
Maumoon Abdul Gayoom will romp home to power consecutively for the
sixth time. It would be no mean achievement for Abdul Gayoom as then
he would have the distinction of celebrating his silver jubilee in
power. Gayoom was initially elected as President of Maldives in 1978
and was subsequently re-elected in 1983, 1988, 1993 and 1999.
Gayoom’s long stay in power may reflect his immense
popularity but that’s not the complete picture. To put it in
perspective, through most of its history Maldives was governed as an
independent Islamic sultanate and was a British protectorate from 1887
till its independence in July 25, 1965. The sultanate continued to
operate for another three years and was finally abolished on November
11, 1968.
The 1968 referendum approved the constitution which
made Maldives a republic with executive, legislative, and judicial
branches of government. The President heads the executive branch and
appoints the cabinet which is nominated to a five-year term by a
secret ballot of the Majlis or the Parliament. Constitutionally, the
President's post has to be confirmed by a national referendum.
Maldives has no organised political parties and
candidates for elective office run as independents on the basis of
personal qualifications. The unicameral Majlis serves five-year terms
and comprises 50 members, eight of whom are nominated by the
President. Two members each from 20 atolls and Male are elected
directly by universal suffrage to send 42 members to the Majlis. The
Majlis has legislative functions and limited powers to control the
executive. The Maldivian legal system, derived mainly from traditional
Islamic law, is administered by secular officials. A chief justice and
lesser judges on each of the 20 atolls are appointed by the President
and function under the Ministry of Justice.
Gayoom who came to power in 1978 replacing Ibrahim
Nasir, who was Prime Minister under the pre-1968 sultanate and held
the office of President from 1968 to 1978, studied at Al Azhar
University in Egypt.He planned to have two houses of Parliament, and
recruit people from all walks of life for the Majlis.
The constitution which was earlier amended in 1970,
1972, and 1975 was further amended under Gayoom largely to consolidate
his power as the President. The most conspicuous feature of the
constitution is, 60 per cent of its clauses deal with the powers and
immunities of the President and 40 per cent of clauses deals with the
responsibilities of the state and the rights of the people.
According to articles 34 and 35 of the
constitution, any person can contest the Presidential election but in
practice this never happened.The so-called public presidential vote by
‘secret ballot’ is only a referendum, where people can only say yes or
no to the decision of the Majlis.
Gayoom’s electoral success in the last 20 years has
been attributed to many reasons. His critics allege that Gayoom has
been successfully manipulating the political process by muzzling all
opposition to him.
When Gayoom came to power in 1978, he promised to
transform the Majlis into a democratic parliament. He also assured
that he would bring multi-party democracy and the country would be
governed by two houses of Parliament. This never happened and the
Majlis remains a unicameral legislative body, reduced to function as
an advisory committee to the President.
The November 8, 1988 abortive coup by Sri Lankan
Tamil mercenaries who tried to overthrow Gayoom’s regime was due to
the growing opposition to the Maldivian President. The general
perception however remains that Indian armed forces that were sent at
the request of the Maldivian President suppressed the attempted coup
and restored Gayoom’s regime within 24 hours.
The fact however remains that the mercenaries after
a long voyage were seasick and even before Indian forces could launch
their operation, an NSS soldier shot dead their leader, which left
them confused. There is no grain of truth that the mercenaries
belonged to the LTTE which wanted to take over Maldives to secure a
base.
From the days of Rajiv Gandhi, the Indian
government has continuously been influencing Gayoom’s regime. India
has been insisting on multi-party system in Maldives and Prime
Minister Vajpayee during his visit to Maldives in September 2002 is
reported to have advised the Maldivian President to bring transparency
in his governance. Gayoom has been using authoritative powers to
suppress any support for a multi-party democratic system. Reformer
Mohamed Nasheed, who was elected to one of the two Malé seats in the
Majlis, was imprisoned on fabricated charges and subsequently exiled.
In another case, Ibrahim Luthfee and few others got life imprisonment
for criticising Gayoom's regime.
In two decades of his rule, Abdul Gayoom has been
able to do a lot for his country which is no mean achievement. It
would be belittling Abdul Gayoom’s achievement to criticise him for
being a dictator. In fact, what Abdul Gayoom has achieved in 20 years
for Maldives most of the democracies may have not been able to
achieve.
This however does not absolve Abdul Gayoom from the
criticism which has been growing in Maldives. Perhaps, he could
counter them by bringing political reforms and more transparency into
his governance. This may take him into the pages of history as the
only statesman Maldives has so far produced, and one to be emulated in
times to come.