Naveen
is a disturbed man. While his family was insisting that he should
marry and settle down , he was sure he wouldn't be happy with a
woman and lead a normal life. For, he was a homosexual and secretly
met male friends. But he was also ashamed about his abnormal trait
and did not want the family to know his preference for a male. His
is a typical case that worries thousands of gays in the Indian
society.
India is the world’s largest democracy, yet its
laws remain as outdated as ever. Indian laws are still governed by
the British Raj which introduced colonial laws in India and other
colonised countries in that period. However, though many laws have
been amended, Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code still needs
amendment and of late has been challenged by voluntary organisations.
According to Section 377, gay sex is illegal, but lesbian sex is not
mentioned. Homosexuality is punishable under the provisions and the
offence is called sodomy. There has been no change with regard to
the concept of this offence and its administration by the Indian
courts. The law says that "Whoever voluntarily has carnal
intercourse against the order of nature, with any man, woman or
animal shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or for a term
which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to fine."
Penetration is sufficient to constitute carnal
intercourse necessary to the offence described in this section. The
form of homosexuality, which is reported either by the police or
society, is generally related to use of force by the one over the
other, though even if there was consent of any of the partners, the
offence is not mitigated. It is considered to be an offence against
society, therefore, the legal system is obliged to punish all those
who are proved to have indulged in it for correctional purposes.
It is due to the prevalence of such laws that
many gays in India are ostracised in society, blackmailed by those
who stumble upon their sexual behaviour, either family or neighbours
or prying relatives, etc. They are thrown out of jobs, too. Of late,
a number of Western countries have accepted homosexual behaviour in
individuals and they are no longer discriminated against, unlike in
India. In an attempt to bring some semblance of respect for
homosexuals, a voluntary organisation working for AIDS awareness,
Naz, has filed a writ petition in the Delhi High Court challenging
the constitutional validity of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code
which criminally penalises what is termed as "unnatural offences",
in so far as the provision affects private sexual acts between
consenting adults.
Says Shaleen Rakesh of Naz, who works with MSM or
gay men who have sex with men: "Our main work is with a section of
men who are vulnerable to contracting HIV/AIDS. During the process
of our work, we discovered that the best way is to promote respect
and protect human rights of vulnerable populations, especially the
MSM community. For that, we need to change the draconian Section 377
as it is an infringement of fundamental rights guaranteed under
Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India."
The petition states that Section 377 is meant to
criminalise sexual acts, which are against the order of nature. This
provision is based upon traditional Judeo-Christian moral and
ethical standards which conceive of sex in purely functional terms,
that is for the purpose of procreation only. A non-procreative
sexual activity is thus viewed as being against the order of nature.
Since homosexual behaviour is a crime under the provisions of
Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, therefore, organisations of
homosexuals are not permitted as legal bodies. However, in Mumbai
and Delhi, there are groups that hang out together. There have been
demonstrations outside the office of the World Health Organisation
in Delhi by homosexual groups after the report that homosexuality is
responsible for the spread of the AIDS virus.
What is punishable is the act of homosexual
behaviour and not discussion or talking about it or its
representation. While in India, people tend to avoid talk of sex or
homosexuality, yet it does not mean that it is not prevalent. Says
Rakesh: "A study shows that 30-40 per cent of men in big cities are
gay, though they may not accept it openly. We cannot say the same
for smaller cities as in bigger cities there is a lot of migrant
population that sleeps on roads, streets or parks and indulges in
homosexual acts. They do not admit it because it is very difficult
for them to break the cultural social pattern . The concept of
homosexuality as a form of co-habitation or of an enjoyable union of
two individuals, is unacceptable in India .
There was a case of two women police constables
who were relieved from service, when their lesbian union became
public, a few years ago. In the early Nineties too, two girl friends
who could not stay away from each other, decided to marry each other
after one of them underwent surgery and became a male. There was a
huge hue-and-cry but the two friends were happily married.
Therefore, homosexual contacts are as common here as in other
cultures. One of the main reasons for MSM in India is that
pre-marital sexual contact between men and women is very difficult.
It is therefore quite common for young men to have sex. It is often
not defined as sex, though, but masti—or "mischief." Sex is between
a husband and wife.
Women are considered to be the property of men
for sex satisfaction, therefore, such defiance of these notions is
not easily tolerated. Moreover, tolerance towards homosexuals is
very much related to the place one lives in. In big cities, it is
more tolerated than in small towns. Bisexuality, outside marriage is
not respectfully looked at and can be an offence even within
marriage if it falls within the definition of an unnatural act.
However, the degree of its offensiveness would again depend upon the
location, with which such behaviour is connected. In big
cosmopolitan cities, it may spark off more individual concern than
of the general public but in small places, it can lead to social
ostracism. The knowledge of the existence of women with homosexual
tendencies is very little in India, though fiction/literature does
exist about it, mainly with a view to describe the lives of social
outcast women, rape victims, women not sought after for marriage or
other kinds of unmarried women.
In Delhi, Central Park, Connaught Place, which
had become a rendezvous of sorts for homosexuals, had also turned
into a mint for the police constables patrolling the area. Couples
were not only forced to pay bribes but also beaten and taken to
police stations. A 1999 film, Fire, which dealt with
lesbianism and which had been cleared by the Censor Board, was not
allowed to be screened in many States. Only Madhya Pradesh and West
Bengal took proactive steps to allow the film to be shown. At times,
offended Hindu mobs led by members of the Shiv Sena, provoked
violence at movie theatres that were showing the film. The issue of
homosexuality is still sensitive in India and is not openly debated
to the extent that it is in the West. It is, however, much more
openly discussed than it was a few years ago and society is tending
to become more tolerant.