|
|
|
|
Pakistan's
American Islam |
|
|
|
|
|
Democracy comes in all shapes
and sizes. Except, of course, clad in a khaki uniform of a serving
General. Even Eisenhower had to get into his civvies to be able to
enter the White House. General Musharraf, now "Refrendu-mised"
President of Pakistan is dead et to prove to the world that if a wolf
in a sheep skin claims to be a sheep, it is a sheep. And who are you
to challenge its well earned status ?
Who does "its" refer to ? The
answer largely depends on who is called upon to frame it. If you are
"a RAW mole" in Karachi you will promptly point your finger at the
wolf. This will, of course, attract a caustic comment from Abdul
Sattar, Foreign Minister in Islamabad. He will probably call it an
Indian conspiracy to discredit the highly democratic exercise called
referendum undertaken recently in Pakistan and yet another brutal and
heinous attempt to trample upon the human rights of the Kashmiri
people.
If you are an American foreign
policy exponent and not Bill Clinton, you will probably promptly point
your finger at the sheep. This is not because you believe that
Musharraf has now fulfilled all the requirements to qualify himself as
a democratically elected President of Pakistan. Far from it. If you
are giving the impression of being a dumb American, it is only because
you are trying to safeguard a national secret. Americans give
everything to their client States from car-seats, Coca Cola to Patton
tanks and Phantom jets but they disallow the export of democracy. It
is dangerous to transfer such high tech sophisticated weaponry to
basically unstable areas of the world.
Presidents-cum-Commanders-in-Chief are suspect in the West, though
Musharraf's immediate neighbour also happens to have a President - cum
- Supreme Commander of Armed Forces. But, of course, he is the Supreme
Commander, does'nt have to go through spit and polish routines or go
to his Regimental `Mess' for Chhota Hazri or `Bada Hazri'. He attends,
though, to the `Mess' of a different kind which comes to him in the
shape of delegations composed of honourable members of the Treasury
Benches and the opposition, each cursing the other over some routine
incident at "Godhra" or the death of a few Sikhs in J & K or more
recently, in the same State, killings of a few bus passengers and
members of the families of armed personnel. The General is, indeed,
aghast as to why the Indians can't show some decency and quietly treat
it as an acceptable collateral damage of suppressing a "freedom
movement" instead of raising a hue and cry and sending to Islamabad a
list of Most-Wanted terrorists responsible for the killings over a
long period of time. The "gun toting" and "Iqbal - quoting " General
is no sucker. He knows what the Allama had, in a moment of his rare
inspiration, said about democracy :
Is baat Ko Ek Mard - E -
Firangi Ne Kiya Fash
Har Chand Ke Dana Esay Khola
Nahin Karte
Jamhorriat woh Tarz-e-hukumat
Hai Ke Jismain
Bandon Ko Gina Karte Hain
Taula Nahin Karte
(A courageous European let out
this secret though wise ones don't spill the beans. Democracy is a
style of Governance in which individuals are counted but never
weighed). That is it. For all of its 50 years of democracy - by the
people, of the people, for the people - what has India got to show ?
Just a roly - poly Prime Minister who is only good enough to run a bus
service from Delhi to Lahore and making conciliatory speeches at
Minara-e-Pakistan. Or to invite a newly self-appointed President and
his betterhalf to have a second honeymoon at the Taj on a moonlit
night. Except for the "Sare Jahan Se Achcha" bit the Indians could
never understand the Allama. Or his wise observations on democracy.
The General, of course, is nobody's fool. He knows his history. That
is why he holds this number game in utter contempt. Once Pakistan was
inveigled (by RAW) to hold India - type elections which threw up
Bhutto and Mujib and it broke up the country. The General is convinced
election is bad news for Pakistan. May be, just as his predecessors
had suggested, "Guided" democracy is the answer. But what is Musharraf
to do? His Western friends, supporters and patrons believe in the game
of numbers. So he has to put up a grand show of having numbers on his
side, hence the referendum. It had the best of both the worlds. It had
the numbers game as also it met Allama's demand that democracy better
be led by a man of "weight" (calibre). Who else but Musharraf could
foot the bill. In addition to his own. considerable `weight' he also
has behind him the entire weight of the Top Brass of the Army, the
Navy and the Air Force. And did anyone say, ISI, as well ? Well may be
! Now that is a lot of `weight' carried by one single individual in
the entire subcontinent. Even the Allama would have been pleased to
pen a panegyric or two extolling dear Pervez. Two damn civilians had
made a mess of things when they had got to the driver's seat. Bhutto
divided the country and got what he plainly deserved. And the other
one, Sharif, was so eager to please his neighbour, none other than
Vajpayee-that he presented Kargil to him on a silver platter and was
even prepared to stoop to killing his top millitary official in an air
crash which was stopped, in the nick of time. By that time, indeed,
every one knew in Pakistan that they had had enough of elected
representatives. But the pressure to return to elected democracy by
the international community kept rising beyond the permissible level.
Even an old friend like an American President (in this case Bill
Clinton) looked positively rude when he reminded Pakistan of democracy
during his brief visit and briefer appearance on PTV (compared to his
exposure on Doordarshan). But thanks to his old friend, philosopher
and guide, Osama bin Laden, the pressure eased considerably after
September 11. The new President, Bush Junior, almost hugged the
General like a long lost cousin. And Musharraf gave a new slogan : "Pehlay
Pakistan". It was the closest Urdu adaptation of our "Vande Mataram".
Allama Iqbal probably turned in his grave. According to Iqbal the
Quran says the Earth belongs to God. Therefore, for a Muslim, who does
not recognise man-made divisions of Earth, his religion comes first.
When the Maulana persisted, the Allama was so enraged that he wrote a
poem denouncing Maulana Madani's concept:
Is Daur main maae Aur Hai Jaam
Aur Hai Jum Aur
Saqui Ne Bina Ki Rawishe -
Lutf - o - Karam Aur
Tehzib Ke Azar Ne
Tarashwa-e-Sanam Aur
In Taza Khudaoon main Bada
Subse Watan Hai
Jo Parahan iska Hai Woh Mazhab
Ka Kafan Hai
(In the new era the wine, the
glasses, the bottles all have changed Even Saqi has changed the style
of serving wine the High Priest of civilzation has had new gods carved
for the temples The biggest among the new gods is the country, (a land
mass with man-made boundaries) The cloth in which it is wrapped
actually serves as a shroud for one's religion). In the same poem,
Iqbal later calls upon the members of the faith to once again revive
the old spirit of Islam and destroy this new god (the country).
Islam Tera Des hai Tu Mustafavi
hai
Ae Mustafavi Khak main is buth
ko Mila Day.
(Your country is Islam and you
are a follower of Prophet Muhammad, come and destroy this newly carved
idol–(country). How does the General reconcile his "Pehlay Pakistan"
with this interpretation of the Quran by Allama Iqbal, remains to be
seen. Islam enjoins upon Muslims to elect the most pious and wise
among them to lead them as Amir-ul-Momineen.
The General is now irrevocably
committed to emancipate Muslims in what he calls " occupied Kashmir"
from the clutches of a country which has been electing its leaders
ever since its inception and which also has the second largest Muslim
population of the world which enjoys the privilege of having its own
personal laws and has complete freedom to follow the religion of its
choice. May we ask to what kind of Islamic system he wishes to deliver
Muslims of "occupied Kashmir"? To a Jordan or Saudi type kingdom? To a
Ayatullah ruled type Iran? To army ruled Algeria ? Or the Libyan type
revolution ? Or to the American brand of Islam now being practised by
Pakistani rulers. The American brand of Islam is nowhere more visible
than in Pakistan. The madrassas once were not such disreputable places
in the subcontinent. After all they had produced scholars like Hussain
Ahmad Madani, Maulana Hifzur Rehman, Ali Miyan, Hafiz Ibrahim and many
such illustrious persons who played a key role in India's independence
movement. Madrassas provided basic education in remote places where
none was available. Then the Americans decided that Madrassas were an
excellent instrument for producing warriors to fight the menace of
Russian communism. The Pakistani rulers went whole hog into it. They
trained Talibans and became their friend, philosopher and guide. After
September 11, the Americans discovered that the Taliban were actually
terrorists and not Muslims.
Without batting an eyelid the
"Good General" turned around clicked his heels and said "yes sir".
That made the old slogan "Pehlay Islam" a bit worn off so he coined a
new one : " Pehlay Pakistan". The distance between " Pehlay Pakistan"
(Pakistan first) and " Pehlay tha Pakistan" (Once there was Pakistan)
has been reduced to less than 5 minutes. The General understands this
kind of thing better. After all he, too, has access to "push button"
warfare.
What he doesn't seem to
understand is that if he wants Pakistan to live he should not hold
referendums but repatriate himself to barracks and let a corrupt,
incompetent but elected civilian blunder his way to peace. As someone
said the other day, war is, too serious a matter to be left to
soldiers. Why does he want to go down as a bad President ? Sorry, that
should have read : Why does he want to follow the bad precedent left
by Yahya and Ayub and ignore the road caution : War ahead. Correction
again, the road caution reads : Nukes Ahead! |
|