voice was one of a moderate in the Hurriyat Conference, a conglomerate
of 23 parties with secessionist leanings.In the murky politics of
Kashmir, Abdul Ghani Lone paid the ultimate price for trying to eschew
the policy of extremism of those who believe in the concept that all
power flows from the barrel of a gun. Lone was a Kashmiri nationalist
who had also begun to oppose a militant movement increasingly under the
sway of non-Kashmiri zealots based in Pakistan. When he visited
Islamabad in November 2000 for the marriage of his son, he expressed the
desire to free the ‘Kashmir struggle’ from the clutches of extremists
and ‘agencies’, a thinly-veiled reference to the ISI. On May 21,
apparently those who did not agree with his views, struck back.Abdul
Ghani Lone was shot dead by unidentified uniformed men during a public
meeting in Srinagar The incident took place during a meeting of about
5,000 people to observe the 12th death anniversary of the former Mirwaiz
of Kashmir Maulvi Mohammad Farooq, father of senior Hurriyat leader Umar
Farooq, at Idgah ground in old Srinagar city.
Lone, 70, was rushed to the Soura Medical Institute
where he was declared "brought dead". He was shot several times from
close range in the chest and stomach. His body had been riddled with
eight bullets. A bodyguard of Lone, Mushtaq Ahmed, was also killed and
another seriously injured in the incident. At least seven other people
were injured in the attack.
‘‘There is no question the ISI is involved here’’,
said a senior Indian official who knew Lone well. ‘‘He was the only
separatist leader who has been taking on Pakistan’’.
Assassinations in Kashmir have always served to
eliminate alternative power centres. In the early years of militancy,
Mirwaiz Maulvi Farooq was assassinated by a faction of the Hizbul
Mujahideen. The current spate of violence — Kaluchak, and now Lone’s
killing — is clearly aimed at disrupting the forthcoming Assembly
election. It is also a warning to the young Mirwaiz, Omar Farooq.
Though Lone, an MLA till 1986 and a former Kashmir
minister, was reluctant to contest as he felt the government had not
come up with a package to redress the grievances of Kashmiris, the
Centre hoped to get him to break ranks with the Hurriyat.
Caught between the government’s unrealistic
expectations of him and the militants’ growing sense of betrayal, Lone
grew vulnerable by the day. His assassination in the current volatile
climate did not come as a total surprise.The irony is that both the
Central and State governments were so lax about his security. Last
November, shots were fired at his house but his security detail was
actually reduced. And on March 31, a Shiv Sena activist in Jammu
assaulted the frail leader before TV cameras as Kashmir policemen stood
around laughing. Shocked by the killing, the Hurriyat called a bandh
which met with good success. The Hurriyat also demanded a judicial probe
into the killing of Lone and security for the slain leader’s family
members. A resolution passed at an emergency meeting of the Hurriyat
executive in Srinagar said Lone’s death was a tragedy for the 23-party
amalgam and the people of Kashmir and his death had created a vacuum
that would be difficult to fill. The conglomerate also blamed Indian
agencies for his killing.
In Pakistan, the United Jehad Council alleged that
Indian agencies were behind Lone’s death. "It is a big tragedy, we
express our sorrow and grief," a UJC spokesman said in Muzaffarabad,
capital of the Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The Prime Minister who was
greeted by the news of the killing of Lone on arrival in Jammu, as well
as Home Minister L.K. Advani regretted the gunning down of the leader
and accused Pakistan of making attempts to destroy peace. Officials saw
a clear link between the incident and the forthcoming elections in the
State.
It was quite clear that pro-Pakistan elements were
trying to scuttle the poll process to discredit the ruling National
Conference as well as the Centre. The hawks in the Hurriyat Conference
are sure to gain an upper hand following the Lone assassination.