Interest
rates were cut by a whopping 5.2 per cent by the Reserve Bank of India
in 2001-02. The cuts are based on the continued fall in the wholesale
price index to which India’s inflation rate is pegged. The expectation
of the Government is, of course, that the rate cuts will lead to
higher investment by the industrial and value-added agricultural
sector which will give an impetus to their worth on the stock markets
and, in turn, will bring investors flocking back to Dalal Street. In
fact, another cut of up to 5 basic points is on the cards by June this
year. Guess what? None of this has happened.
While the plunging share prices can be attributed
to investor fears due to the dark war clouds looming over the
subcontinent, it is equally true that even before the current
political crisis, the rising share market was buoyed by mergers and
acquisitions and consequent open offers to the public as well as by
the Government’s divestment policy which suddenly came alive and not
because corporates were looking to the share markets to raise capital.
In fact, the corporate sector found a different use
altogether for the massive decrease in interest rates. They took loans
at the lower rate, paid off their old high-interest rate liabilities
and, lo and behold, their bottom lines showed a significant
improvement, despite a rise in manufacture costs and slackening demand
in most industrial sectors. Their paper worth went up which made them
eligible for more loans at the reduced interest rates.
The cut in interest rates appears to be
counter-productive in another way, too. With interest rates at
unprecedented lows, the capital market is no longer attractive to
corporates for raising investment funds. The reason is the difference
in shareholder perceptions in India and most other countries. Here, we
still look on shares as an investment which provides returns by way of
dividends—like a UTI unit or a preference share. In most countries,
the dividend is virtually irrelevant; it is the appreciation in the
value of the stock which is regarded as its true earning potential by
the investor. In fact, more and more companies in the Western world
are not giving dividends at all to their shareholders.
Digressing for a moment, this is also the reason
why the Indian stock markets are beset by so many scams and scandals.
When dividend and not intrinsic worth is the sole criterion of a
company’s profitability, the door is open to all kinds of manipulators
and fake promoters to enter the market with attractive announcements,
fleece the public investors and vanish into thin air. This has
happened hundreds of times in the past, the watchdog, SEBI, forgetting
the dog part of its mandate has just watched it happen. That the Home
Trade scam was restricted to the banks, where the general public’s
money is insured, is fortunate. If, as the company had planned, it had
managed to secure approval to list on the stock market, lakhs of small
investors would have been sucked into the scam.
Coming back to the interest rate cuts, it is quite
clear that Corporate India is not happy with the investment scenario,
especially as the Indo-Pak fracas hots up. In such an environment, to
even consider a further rate cut is ridiculous. It may be argued that
if the corporates are not interested in institutional loans, it makes
no difference if the interest rate is raised, maintained or reduced.
Not true. When lending rates are cut, deposit rates are also reduced
correspondingly. The backbone of the lauded Indian savings habit is
the return on savings. Millions of retired people and others depend on
interest income to see them through the last years of their life. When
Yashwant Sinha tried to raise funds by cutting into the concessions
for savings in the last budget, he was forced by his political masters
to roll back almost all such measures. But nobody in the Government
seems to realise that lowering interest rates without achieving the
investment target is just another way of cutting into the average
Indian’s return on savings. Does it not make more sense to streamline
the working of the share markets so that the small investor is
safeguarded from market scams and fly-by-night operators who loot his
hard earned savings which will also make it more attractive to the
corporates, no matter how low institutional interest rates are?
Remember, interest has to be paid, no matter what, but dividends can
be increased or lowered depending on the profitability of the company.
In fact, paying dividends is not mandatory if a company is in the red.
But it still has to pay interest on its loans. Reducing the bank rate
alone is not sufficient to boost economic growth. There are other more
major factors involved, such as economic and political stability,
growth in the employment rate and a quantum jump in the credibility of
our political rulers. This is what makes for an attractive investment
climate, not just cheaper money. Of course, banks will have no problem
in meeting their credit targets, but is the money going where it was
intended to—towards strengthening the economy? So far it has only
strengthened the bottom line of companies like Reliance and Grasim and
other industrial giants.