Home | National | States | International | Business | Cover Story | Sports | Hot Tips | Third Eye

 
   Flash News        

Flash News

High Wages = Low Job Security

Promoting a Tourism Culture

No Second  Airport at  Metros

Mobile cash card now in cops’ phone book

Others
The greatest of the great walked in these corridors

Tests on animals - A cruel necessity

Bio Diesel - Auto Fuel of the future

Trimphu Trails

The DayAfter Bookworld - Are you a Bookman?

Justice delayed ,Not denied

  Falling Interest Rates — Who Benefits?
  • Dara Nair

 
This has happened hundreds of times in the past, the watchdog, SEBI, forgetting the dog part of its mandate has just watched it happen.


 

Interest rates were cut by a whopping 5.2 per cent by the Reserve Bank of India in 2001-02. The cuts are based on the continued fall in the wholesale price index to which India’s inflation rate is pegged. The expectation of the Government is, of course, that the rate cuts will lead to higher investment by the industrial and value-added agricultural sector which will give an impetus to their worth on the stock markets and, in turn, will bring investors flocking back to Dalal Street. In fact, another cut of up to 5 basic points is on the cards by June this year. Guess what? None of this has happened.

While the plunging share prices can be attributed to investor fears due to the dark war clouds looming over the subcontinent, it is equally true that even before the current political crisis, the rising share market was buoyed by mergers and acquisitions and consequent open offers to the public as well as by the Government’s divestment policy which suddenly came alive and not because corporates were looking to the share markets to raise capital.

In fact, the corporate sector found a different use altogether for the massive decrease in interest rates. They took loans at the lower rate, paid off their old high-interest rate liabilities and, lo and behold, their bottom lines showed a significant improvement, despite a rise in manufacture costs and slackening demand in most industrial sectors. Their paper worth went up which made them eligible for more loans at the reduced interest rates.

The cut in interest rates appears to be counter-productive in another way, too. With interest rates at unprecedented lows, the capital market is no longer attractive to corporates for raising investment funds. The reason is the difference in shareholder perceptions in India and most other countries. Here, we still look on shares as an investment which provides returns by way of dividends—like a UTI unit or a preference share. In most countries, the dividend is virtually irrelevant; it is the appreciation in the value of the stock which is regarded as its true earning potential by the investor. In fact, more and more companies in the Western world are not giving dividends at all to their shareholders.

Digressing for a moment, this is also the reason why the Indian stock markets are beset by so many scams and scandals. When dividend and not intrinsic worth is the sole criterion of a company’s profitability, the door is open to all kinds of manipulators and fake promoters to enter the market with attractive announcements, fleece the public investors and vanish into thin air. This has happened hundreds of times in the past, the watchdog, SEBI, forgetting the dog part of its mandate has just watched it happen. That the Home Trade scam was restricted to the banks, where the general public’s money is insured, is fortunate. If, as the company had planned, it had managed to secure approval to list on the stock market, lakhs of small investors would have been sucked into the scam.

Coming back to the interest rate cuts, it is quite clear that Corporate India is not happy with the investment scenario, especially as the Indo-Pak fracas hots up. In such an environment, to even consider a further rate cut is ridiculous. It may be argued that if the corporates are not interested in institutional loans, it makes no difference if the interest rate is raised, maintained or reduced. Not true. When lending rates are cut, deposit rates are also reduced correspondingly. The backbone of the lauded Indian savings habit is the return on savings. Millions of retired people and others depend on interest income to see them through the last years of their life. When Yashwant Sinha tried to raise funds by cutting into the concessions for savings in the last budget, he was forced by his political masters to roll back almost all such measures. But nobody in the Government seems to realise that lowering interest rates without achieving the investment target is just another way of cutting into the average Indian’s return on savings. Does it not make more sense to streamline the working of the share markets so that the small investor is safeguarded from market scams and fly-by-night operators who loot his hard earned savings which will also make it more attractive to the corporates, no matter how low institutional interest rates are? Remember, interest has to be paid, no matter what, but dividends can be increased or lowered depending on the profitability of the company. In fact, paying dividends is not mandatory if a company is in the red. But it still has to pay interest on its loans. Reducing the bank rate alone is not sufficient to boost economic growth. There are other more major factors involved, such as economic and political stability, growth in the employment rate and a quantum jump in the credibility of our political rulers. This is what makes for an attractive investment climate, not just cheaper money. Of course, banks will have no problem in meeting their credit targets, but is the money going where it was intended to—towards strengthening the economy? So far it has only strengthened the bottom line of companies like Reliance and Grasim and other industrial giants.

TOP


Editor's Page | Interview | Open House | Hot Tips |Business | News Makers | Sports
Society & Health | Silver Screen |Cover Story | Subscription | Advertising | Archives
National |International |States