This needs due attention.
According to a survey conducted by Merrill Lynch, over 200,000 Indians
are multi-millionaires in the U. S. A. This study was undertaken in
2000 but its results have recently been made public. The survey
revealed that the average yearly income of an Indian stood at around $
60,000. Against this, an average native U. S. citizen earned about $
38,885 a year.
This raises a legitimate
question that has often been asked but never answered satisfactorily.
How could expatriate Indians succeed so well in a distant land, and
why they didn’t, or rather couldn’t do likewise in their country of
birth? A host of reasons are cited for this.
The pull factor is the lure of Western civilisation.
Images of a glamorous life in the U. S. A. are being continuously
flashed every moment in
U. S.-controlled TV channels. This may have cast a magic spell on our
young professionals and enticed them away from their own land.
The second factor is the availability of greater
opportunities for research, existence of a work culture in which hard
work and intelligence are appreciated and adequately rewarded. In such
a milieu the intelligent and industrious Indian expatriates found the
U. S. A. the right soil to take root in and flourish.
In contrast, the employment situation for these
professionals at home was not attractive at all. The work culture in
which excellence alone mattered did not exist to a large extent. In
matters of employment, one’s connections mattered more, rather than
talent.
Thirdly, opportunities were not available for
research work in India. On the other hand, what drew them to Uncle
Sam’s land were an excellent research infrastructure, guidance for
making progress in their chosen field and, above all, unlimited funds.
All this has been confirmed by the statements of
Indians who migrated to the U. S. A., rose to the highest positions in
their research or technological fields and won top laurels, including
the world’s topmost honour, the Nobel Prize. They openly stated how
they were discriminated against in India in getting jobs in
universities and elsewhere. In such a situation, they preferred to
migrate to the
U. S. A. to fulfil their dreams.
Whatever be the reasons for the Indians who made it
to the U. S. A. and struck gold, one thing is sure: they still have a
soft corner for India. They also want to do something for its
development especially in their own area of work. This can be seen in
many instances where some of these NRIs (Non-Resident Indians) have
personally participated or donated funds for the development of
villages or towns. Some have opened free schools and dispensaries and
contributed money for developmental projects. Keeping this in mind, if
some of the organisations of these NRIs in the U. S. A. are approached
to raise money for managing developmental projects anywhere in India,
the response would be excellent.
A traveller to the U. S. A. happened to meet lots
of well-to-do Indians, now U. S. citizens. Many of them wanted to lend
a helping hand, especially in the scientific and technological
progress of India. But they desist from doing so for many reasons. The
most glaring is the existence of too much red tape and official
interference in launching any project.
They said that it was not the top-level bureaucracy
which placed hurdles in the execution of any project, but only the
middle rung and lowest level officials. Even when this is brought to
the notice of the top bureaucracy, most often they show their
helplessness in tackling such situations. In many cases, by the time
the hurdles are removed, too much precious time would have been
wasted. In the process, their enthusiasm vanishes. Of course, all
these so-called hurdles are methods of extracting money from the NRIs.
Corruption seems to have taken deep roots in the bureaucratic and
political set-up.
There is only one remedy for making the NRIs come
and invest their money and skills in the country in specific projects
related to their expertise. It lies in creating a special department
with wide-ranging powers, so that the NRIs can contact the department
concerned to sort out small or big bureaucratic hurdles.
Next, since there are varied groups of Indians
settled in the
U. S. A., they have too many umbrella organisations of their own. The
Government of India should have a liaison officer in the U. S. A. to
contact these organisations and place before them those areas of
developmental work where their participation could prove extremely
helpful and fruitful.
Lastly, whatever project an NRI organisation
decides to take up with prior consultation with the Government of
India, it should be allowed a free hand in its execution. This will
generate confidence in the NRI organisations and give them a sense of
having achieved whatever they had set out to do.