As the international situation is undergoing a
major shift since the fall of Saddam Hussein’s regime, Moscow may feel
the necessity to offset the repercussions of its flawed policies on
Iraq. Subsequently, there have been renewed calls for a
Moscow-Beijing-New Delhi triangle, a potential alliance of three
nuclear-armed countries of some 2.5 billion people, that theoretically
would be able to balance U. S. power in the coming years.
There have been a number of fresh signs to
substantiate axis talk. "Russia will continue interaction with its
partners in the Moscow-Beijing-New Delhi triangle," Foreign Minister
Igor Ivanov stated at an Association of Southeast Asian Nations
(ASEAN) meeting. "This interaction is important for international
stability in general," he was quoted by the official Russian
Information Agency (RIA).
Also, at the ASEAN meeting in Phnom Penh, Russia,
China and India reportedly gave "signals" that they would sign up for
the grouping’s Treaty of Amity and Co-operation (TAC), a sort of
non-aggression pact among the 10 ASEAN member-states.
In the meantime, Moscow has praised Indian Prime
Minister Vajpayee’s trip to China as significant for global stability.
Russian Foreign Minister Ivanov noted that Moscow hailed "more active
dialogue" between Beijing and New Delhi.
The Chinese Foreign Ministry denied that there was
any move to form a China-India-Russia strategic alliance, only
conceding that the three countries have been sharing similar views on
some international issues.
For instance, there is a growing arms-sale
relationship between Russia and the two Asian countries. The trade
provides Moscow with billions of much-needed dollars and important
arms-export markets, while Beijing and New Delhi get sophisticated
armaments ranging from combat aircraft to submarines. Russia and India
recently held their first joint naval exercise in the Indian Ocean,
when a large task force of Russian surface ships and nuclear attack
submarines simulated attacks on aircraft-carrier groups. The naval
exercise was co-ordinated with a mission by long-range bombers.
A "strategic triangle" among Russia, India and
China was first suggested by then Russian Premier Yevgeny Primakov
four years ago. Yet the idea failed to serve its immediate purpose of
preventing the U. S.-led North Atlantic Treaty Organisation air
strikes against former Yugoslavia, a concept dismissed by Beijing
while New Delhi remained non-committal. Last November, New Delhi
denied that India, Russia and China were forming a separate axis,
adding that the talks among the three countries in New York the
previous September had been informal.
However, in December, Russian President Vladimir
Putin travelled to China and India, and high-level rhetoric about the
need for greater co-operation also included thinly-veiled anti-Western
pronouncements and calls for a "multipolar world", Moscow’s mantra for
counterbalancing America’s global dominance.
So far, the "strategic triangle" concept is yet to
be formally coined. However, Russia, China and India are understood to
have a number of converging interests that could add substance to axis
talk. All three were disturbed by the Iraq war and protested against
what they viewed as a rejection of the rules of the international
game.
On the other hand, the idea that now the Eastern
axis may be the only answer to U. S. arrogance has been dismissed as a
mere by-product of the Cold War-era mindset.
There have been warnings that a well-armed and
strong China may one day not just make Russia its junior partner, but
even pose a threat to Russia’s resource-rich Far East. Incidentally,
Moscow seems to be taking some measures of precaution.
Meanwhile, the Shanghai Co-operation Organisation (SCO)
can provide a convenient forum for the trilateral axis. Now the SCO
includes China, Russia, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and
Tajikistan, and India has been touted as a potential candidate.
India’s joining could raise the SCO’s significance. There is a growing
economic dimension in the partnership between Russia and China. During
Hu’s visit, a 25-year oil-supply deal was signed between Russia’s
Yukos and the China National Petroleum Corp (CNPC). That accord calls
for a 2,400-kilometre pipeline from eastern Siberia to the northern
Chinese city of Daqing that will carry 20 million tonnes of crude per
year for the first five years once construction is completed.
Late last month, China and Russia struck an
unprecedented deal jointly to survey oil and natural-gas resources in
their border areas.
In May, Hu not only put his signature on a
strategic energy pact with Putin, but also attended the SCO summit.
The SCO presidents gathered in the Kremlin and agreed to have a
secretariat in Beijing and a Regional Anti-Terrorist Force in the
Kyrgyz capital Bishkek from 2004.
There is, thus, a motivation in all three capitals
to co-operate on strategic, security and economic issues. But aside
from calls for a "multipolar world", the idea of an axis seemingly is
yet to evolve into a clear-cut strategy.
The would-be "strategic triangle" is still short of
an implementation system, a prerequisite to ensuring future success of
any stratagem. In the meantime, none of the troika wants to give the
impression that they are "ganging up" against the sole
superpower.