|
|
|
|
|
GANDHI IN THE EYES OF THE VHP It
seems that the VHP is not happy with conferring the name of Nehru on
Vajpayee and in their own personal ‘tryst with destiny’ have hit upon
the name of Gandhi. Gandhi was an irritating name to the Sanghwallas and
it would be interesting to see how they associate their favourite hero,
Vajpayee, with the Gandhi name (There’s Sonia Gandhi also to reckon
with). The VHP, seeing that its relevance to the Ram Janambhoomi issue
is being whittled down by the sincere efforts of the Kanchi
Shankaracharya, now wants to put a roadblock towards a peaceful
resolution of the dispute. So they are hell-bent on turning all those
who are trying to resolve the issue with the paint of villainy. And who
would be a better villain for them than the Father of the Nation? But
they seem to be attributing Vajpayee with a higher level of villainy.
Gandhiji, according to them, had caused the partition of the country
into only two parts, but Vajpayee would break the country into ten. So
beware, and place your fate in the hands of the likes of Singhal,
Togadia and Giriraj Kishore, the triumvirate which only, repeat only,
can preserve the unity and integrity of the nation. It seems to be a
case of giving a dog a bad name and hanging it.
|
|
THE CASUALTY WITH CAS Whenever
the Government wants to improve its governance or ‘help the masses’ its
plans somehow always get deferred. It happened with VAT (Value Added
Tax) and now afflicted CAS (Conditional Access System). The BJP
government wanted to make cable and channel payments transparent and
simple. There were large-scale protests by the business community
against the introduction of VAT which it said would complicate the
taxation system and make it more stringent. The Government now faces
similar opposition from cable operators in regard to CAS. They allege
that the introduction of set-top boxes for conditional access would mean
added expenditure to the viewers. Caught in the crossfire is the common
man who, all of a sudden finds so many segments of society actually
sparing a thought for him. Sometimes ‘care’ kills, doesn’t it?
|
|
SIMPLE SECURITY As soon as a
politician gets into a seat of power, he spares no effort and no time to
adorn himself with the trappings of the post, probably in a bid to
project himself bigger than he actually is. The need for symbolism to
assert himself sometimes goes to ridiculous lengths. Like every Tom,
Dick and Harry wanting ‘Black Cat’ security even though no one in his
senses would even touch him with a bargepole.
Recently, Sonia Gandhi who, as leader of the
opposition, can rightfully claim many of the trappings, did the
opposite—she did away with them. She spent a short vacation in Kasauli
without any additional security. In fact, she did not even inform the
Government of Uttaranchal, even though the State was being ruled by her
own party. Obviously, she did not want her presence to create discomfort
for the common people of the town and throw daily life out of gear. She
used a car without a red beacon light and had no escort cars. When will
our other politicians, who claim to be ‘leaders of the people’, realise
that they too are just one of us and live likewise?
|
|
HINDUTVA, DIGVIJAY STYLE
Digvijay Singh is preparing to fight the fundamentalist BJP in Madhya
Pradesh with its own weapons. He beat them at their own game by
inaugurating a Hanuman temple in the premises of a hospital. The other
Hanuman temple controversy in which Uma Bharti celebrated the deity’s
birthday by cutting a cake (eggless?) inside the temple premises is
still strong in public memory and Digvijay Singh seems to making inroads
into the traditional BJP vote bank using the same methods but modified
to conform to sanctity, and sanity. This moderate Hindutva is more
acceptable to the people rather than the militant RSS form. Digvijay has
also shown his liberalism in reserving seats for different classes and
communities. He is thus emerging as a secular politician, the need of
the hour and a rare commodity. Now the Congress cannot be accused of
being pseudo-secular and the BJP cannot claim to be the only national
party representing the political cause of the Hindus.
|
|
SPG WITHIN CONGRESS Sonia
Gandhi, say Congress inner circles, has set the SPG to cut to size those
Congress leaders who get too big for their boots. And that has also set
off an inner party war between the Punjabi Khatris and Brahmins. The
Khatri triumvirate comprises R. K. Dhawan, Kamal Nath Malhotra and
Ambika Soni. And they have tried their best to vanquish the Brahmins who
once dominated the Congress. Among the vanquished are already many
Tewaris, Tripathis and Sharmas within the party. Brahmins are however
Brahmins and have now chosen to strike back to ensure that once what was
once called the Brahmin Congress maintains its class character. Their
specific attack is now on the SPG member considered the closest to the
Congress President. They have been digging up political dirt on her
including skeletons from the past like her deposition against Indira
Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi before the Shah Commission and her saying good
bye to the Congress and joining the Congress(S). But will they get
Ambika? And what has the SPG got to do with Congress politics? No, this
SPG is not that SPG which is controlled by the government. According to
well-informed Congress cynics, it is short for "Sonia Pallu Group", or
those who hover around the Congress President all the time.
|
|
A PLANE FOR A TRAIN How far one
goes in competition and rivalry can be understood by the bitterness in
the relationship between our Minister of Railways, Nitish Kumar, and
Defence Minister George Fernandes. Their one-upmanship takes the cake.
If George invests crores of rupees in the upgradation of a certain type
of plane, then Nitish devotes much more money to the safety of
passengers travelling by train. In such fashion, such healthy
competition would have taken India much ahead. But it seems they have
taken recourse to the maxim ‘an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth’ and
interpolated it with ‘a plane for a train and a train for a plane’.
Being outdone by George initially in the number of MIG crashes, Nitish
has decided to take the number of rail accidents to a new high which
would be almost impossible for the ‘flying defence minister’ to reach. |
|