|
Are Sarkaria Commission
recommendations outdated?
LALIT
SETHI
Much water has flown through the Indian rivers since the
recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission were implemented. There are
States that have displayed pathetic ineptitude in political, financial
and administrative affairs and probably they need being disciplined by
the Centre. Of greater cause to worry is that of the 600 districts in
the country 200 are being controlled by Maoists Naxalites. Can the new
Commission set up to address problems that face the Centre and the
States?
The
Union Government has set up a new commission to review its relations
with the States as it feels that the recommendations made by the
Sarkaria Commission 20 years ago and implemented then have become
outdated. In its opinion, it is necessary to take a close look at the
new ground realities in a rapidly changing scenario, internally and
world wide. The separatist movements in several parts of the country
have become very volatile, if not excessively violent, threatening not
only the federal structure, but posing a great danger to the nation as a
whole.
Add
to it the new dimension of Maoist Naxalites who have spread their
network and tentacles to 200 of the 600 districts of the country and
control nearly 30 per cent of the landmass, mainly in the interior, be
it forests or deforested, which has thrown the Adivasis or tribals to
the wolves of many kinds. They can no longer live off the land or forest
produce as they have done for centuries. The cutting down of trees and
forests to make room for farming and industrial projects has displaced
them. Rehabilitation of these hapless people is not even in name. They
are ready recruits for the revolutionary Maoists, who promise them the
moon, a better tomorrow, if nothing much today. They give them guns,
uniforms and bare food, but train them to loot and plunder. The Maoists
are so well trained and they make forays into towns and demand ransom
from the wealthy in towns and cities.
Although the terms of reference of the new commission do not talk of the
Maoist threat openly, but the reference to Article 355 of the
Constitution and laws under it speak of Centre's right to intervene with
rapid deployment forces at times of complete breakdown of law and order
is implicit. A proposal to bring up new laws or amend the Constitution
to achieve this purpose has been thrown up by the Union Home Minister,
Mr. Shivraj Patil, who knows pretty well that his coalition government
cannot easily do these things even if an interim report of the
commission, headed by a former Supreme Court judge, now in place, makes
such a suggestion in the near future. Today's federal structure makes
the Centre dependent almost totally on the regional parties and these
parties are asserting their clout, and are not allowing the Centre to
breathe easy.
Although the terms of reference do not possibly mention the powers of
the Governors of the States, but it is implicit in the move to set up
the commission, that the Centre would like to use their good offices and
their power to discipline certain States, which appear to be amenable to
no discipline, financial, administrative and political, leave alone the
enormous lengths to which corruption has spread and the fact that the
satraps of the States, regardless of their political complexion, sap
their own region and their own people. Whether they are blood suckers or
not had better be left unsaid.
Although the Finance Commission, new or old, is almost always in place
to determine the devolution of funds from the Centre to the States and
lay down the formulae for the sharing of resources on the basis of
population and performance, the new commission will also examine that
aspect. Whether that will amount to duplication of the work of the
Finance Commission is a matter that is bound to be debated by the
political class and parties in office and out of it, once they are free
from the crucial Assembly elections in the second week of May or after
they have overcome the summer blues, which have hit the country far and
wide. The Planning Commission is another powerful authority, which
monitors the performance of the States and scrutinizes their annual
plans year after year on the basis of their achievements or failure to
carry out projects and allocates resources to them prior to the annual
budgetary process.
But
as the Central realization of taxes has increased by 70 per cent in the
financial year ended on March 31, the share of the States can be
expected to have gone up by that massive 70 per cent, regardless of
their performance. As the States are entitled to 75 per cent of the
national savings schemes, and the rate of national savings has gone up
to 31 per cent from 23 per cent, their share of funds from that source
has also gone up by 8 per cent.
With
people now switching back to bank and postal savings scheme after
burning their fingers at the stock markets, the savings are expected to
be more buoyant than ever. But the Centre remains concerned that even if
there is no shortage of resources, the utilization of funds is poor and
often there is enormous leakage of money into the pockets of all classes
that have a degree of power in collusion with building mafias and
contractors executing projects much below the standards required or
showing them only on paper rather than on the ground.
The
commission would consider a proposal whether the State Governments could
be bypassed and allocations sent straight to the districts and
panchayats as well as non governmental organization. It is very much on
the table, but the State bosses are opposed to it tooth and nail as it
diminishes their financial pre eminence. But even though the sarpanches
and NGOs have welcomed the move, it is beginning to come to the surface
that the sarpanches are acquiring an unheard of political power and they
are enjoying it. Whether these moves will further pollute the scenario
in the countryside remains to be seen. Whether these moves will succeed
remains unknown.
The
key question is how many years will the present commission will take to
come up with its final recommendations and what will be the complexion
of the government at the Centre and in the States when its
recommendations are made known. How long will government take to reach a
conclusion, if and when the report is ready. Will there be changes in
the composition of the commission in course of time by the natural
process and how will that impact the suggestions. These questions had
better be left in the womb of time. |