Strange
are the ways of the Indian economy. While there is general talk of
recession, with industrial slowdown worrying the market analysts,
there comes the cheerful news from the State Bank of India that its
profits have gone up by over 51 per cent. The largest public sector
bank has also declared a dividend of 60 per cent. On the other hand,
one of the largest investor-based mutual funds, the Unit Trust of
India let down millions of people. For the first time since its
inception, the Unit Trust of India decided to skip the dividend on its
flagship scheme US-64 for the year ending June 30, 2002.
The flagship scheme is a Net
Asset Value (NAV) based scheme and there was no sanctity attached to
announcing any dividend. Whenever the performance of the scheme
improves, the Board can review the decision and decide about paying
the dividend, UTI chairman, M. Damodaran stated. Last year (2000-01),
despite the financial crisis which gripped the flagship scheme, the
Board had announced a 10 per cent dividend.
In a statement, UTI said that in
arriving at the decision, the Board noted that this would increase the
gap between the NAV and the repurchase price determined as a part of
the special relief package for US-64. On meeting the shortfall on its
two schemes—Monthly Income Plan 1997 (II) and Special Institutional
Investors Scheme—Damodaran said UTI would use a credit line of Rs.
1,000 crore from the State Bank of India on the back of a guarantee
given by the Union Government.
The State Bank of India,
meanwhile, reported a spurt in net profit at Rs. 2,431.62 crore for
the financial year 2001-02 as compared to Rs. 1,604.25 crore in the
previous year. The bank also provided a whopping Rs. 2,153.10 crore
towards NPAs. The board recommended an increased dividend of 60 per
cent against 50 per cent to the shareholders following the increase in
net profit, SBI Chairman, Janaki Ballabh announced.
He said the net profit would
have been Rs. 2,841.76 crore this fiscal had there been no provision
for investment depreciation, including amortisation of premium on the
‘held to maturity’ category, as well as the pro-rata write-off of
deferred revenue expenditure relating to VRS. An increased provision
of Rs. 2,153.10 crore for NPAs and Rs. 1,267.52 crore (Rs. 971 crore)
towards adjustment of deferred tax and Rs. 1,76.89 crore towards
provision for depreciation on investment in India, including
amortisation of premium on ‘held to maturity’ category as against a
write-back of Rs. 140.19 crore in 2000-01 were primarily responsible
for less than the expected net profit, he said. The deferred VRS cost
accounted for Rs. 355 crore, while the provisioning for depreciation
on investment accounted for Rs. 200 crore. According to Ballabh,
retail lending like housing loans, educational loans and personal
loans will continue to be thrust areas for SBI during the years to
come. "We are targeting to disburse Rs. 7,000 crore personal loans, Rs.
4,500 crore housing loans, Rs. 4,500 crore agriculture loans and Rs.
2,500 crore other loans during the current fiscal," he revealed.