|
|
| |
|
| |
Media Pulse |
| |
Print media can hold its head high |
| |
T HE
National Readership Study (NRS) 2002 has some good news for newspapers;
the readership of the print media has grown by 10 per cent in the last
two years. According to NRS 2002, the press has added over 17 million
readers in the last two years. The reader base in India has grown from
163 million to 180 million, a growth of 10 per cent. What is interesting
is that there is still a significant scope for growth in this segment as
248 million adults who are literate do not read any publication.
Another interesting fact that comes to light is that
there are nearly as many rural readers as urban. Of the 180 million
readers, as many as 48 per cent are from six lakh villages scattered
across India. According to NRS 2002, the reader base for
dailies/newspapers increased from 131 million in 1989 to 156 million
this year, an increase of 20 per cent. The growth in the reach of
dailies is substantially higher than the literacy growth of 13 per cent
in the same period. Language dailies have contributed significantly to
this growth. The highest read Hindi daily in India now surpasses a
readership of 13 million. The newspaper has now extended its reach to
the urban housewife/FMCG decision makers. According to NRS 2002, 25.4
million urban housewives as compared to 21.7 million in 1999, now read
daily newspapers. And this comes at the cost of reading magazines which
was considered a staple diet for most women. The survey shows a decline
in readers of magazines. Magazines, overall, show a decline in the
reader base, both in urban and rural India. The reach of magazines has
declined from 93.8 million in 1999 to 86.2 million in 2002. Magazines
have lost 22 per cent of their reach since 1999, taking into account the
population growth over these years. The decline is mainly in the general
interest, film/entertainment and sports magazines, where the percentage
decline on an average is over 25 per cent. The time spent on traditional
media has marginally declined in urban markets. According to the report,
in 1999 an urban adult spent on an average 14 hours a week or 2 hours a
day on traditional media, that is, press, TV, radio and Internet. Since
then, the time spent per week per urban adult has declined to 13 hours a
week or about 7 minutes less per day per adult.
In comparison, the time spent on traditional media in
villages is virtually half—6 hours per adult—and this is more or less
constant since 1999. The decline in time spent on traditional media has
not affected reading time in urban media. The average reader still
spends about 16 per cent of his total media time, that is, 18 minutes
per day, in reading a daily/magazine.
Urban India now spends marginally less time watching
TV although TV still commands the lion’s share of media consumption.
According to NRS 2002, TV still commands a 72 per cent share of the
average 13 hours spent on traditional media the amongst urban audience.
If taken in absolute terms, there is a slight decline in time spent on
TV in this market. Despite the increasing programme options, the average
viewing time has come down from 85 minutes in 1999 to 82 minutes in
2002. The growth in C&S penetration is more than twice the growth in
TV-owning homes. As per the report, TV now reaches 81.6 million Indian
homes and reflects a growth of 12 per cent since 1999. Access to C&S
homes jumped from 29 million in 1999 to 40 million in 2002—a 31 per cent
growth rate, more than twice the growth of the TV market. C&S
subscription has now penetrated 50 per cent of all TV homes. Another
interesting fact thrown up by NRS 2002 is that Internet reach exceeds 6
million homes. The access to Internet in the last 3 months increased to
6 million. The growth of the Internet has stabilised at 2 million
annually.
NRS 2002 is conducted by pooling the resources of
IMRB, TNS Mode and AC Nielsen. The current report is an update on April
2002. |
| |
FDI to change
Indian print media Indian
print media is set for a major change following the government decision
to permit 26 per cent FDI in Indian entities publishing
newspapers/periodicals dealing with news and current affairs. The
landmark decision, though not entirely unexpected, is a "partial
modification" of the earlier 1955 Cabinet decision on the subject. The
step will give a fillip to several English and regional publications
waiting for funds to take on near monopolies in publishing. The Indian
Newspaper Society, however maintained that "FDI will compromise national
interest." It commented that it did not matter whether it was 26 per
cent or 74 per cent as the foreign investor can always control policies
and content.
The official press note issued by the Information and
Broadcasting Ministry said - "A comprehensive review of the whole matter
has been carried out now…. The policy now would provide for 26 per cent
FDI in Indian entities publishing newspapers/ periodicals dealing with
news and current affairs, after suitable verifications by the Central
Govenment and the editorial and management control remaining fully in
Indian hands." This will, in effect, open the door for Indian media
houses seeking foreign investments to upgrade their infrastructure and
compete with large near-monopolistic competition. The Government also
allowed upto 74 per cent equity investment in Indian editions of foreign
owned technical journals and speciailty ‘non- news’ magazines. The
Indian Newspaper Society (INS) reiterated its stance opposing the
decision. Citing arguments like ‘threat to national interest’,
‘invaluable contribution to the freedom struggle’ and ‘FDI will
jeopardise harmonious relationship among the different communities’ in
support of the anti-FDI rhetoric, the INS chose to distance itself from
the decision. "It is a matter of surprise and consternation that the
Government have overlooked the recommendation of the Parliamentary
Standing Committee on IT headed by Somnath Chatterjee and allowed entry
of FDI in print," commented INS President Pratap Pawar.
While the print body was circumspect, the
Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) lauded the Government’s decision.
"Allowing FDI is a bold and significant step. This is a positive first
step. It will take a year to stabilise. After discussions with major
publications, CII had made a recommendation to Ministry," remarked Biren
Ghosh, member of CII sub- committee on Entertainment.
At many print organisations, notably India Today,
Indian Express, Mid-Day, Dainik Jagran and
Business Standard, the mood is upbeat. Others like Bharat Kapadia
are cautious, "There is a plus as well as a minus. Right-minded
investors can improve the knowledge base and technology. But this
critical medium in wrong hands can also cause serious problems." The
government, on its part, has however taken a few precautions to prevent
misuse. Besides, the editorial and management control remaining fully in
Indian hands, the approval to allow FDI will be on a case-to-case basis
giving the government time to review each proposal. To avoid effective
management control by foreign players holding 26 per cent–, the
Government has stipulated that the largest Indian shareholder should
have ‘substantially’ higher holding. Detractors argue that these clauses
leave much to interpretation and can lead to slow decisions.
The Government has taken a calculated risk on FDI in
print media, as the RSS and Swadeshi Jagran Manch, have been opposed to
the move. The Congress the government had gone ahead with a decision on
which there was no consensus.The Left parties attacked the "handing over
of the media to the imperialist powers." The monsoon session of
Parliament could see fireworks over the issue.
Dissent and brickbats aside, the Cabinet decision will set the tone
for the new print media environment, more resources facilitating content
generation, marketing, HR and international best practices. The move
will also be a boon for journalists, who are on the lookout for greener
pastures as the foreign investors, flush with money, will need quality
journalists at any price. |
|