|
THE
President of the Naga National Council (NNC), Adino Phizo, explained
that Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee’s announcement of huge
economic package to Nagaland amounting Rs. 1050 crore during his recent visit
to the State will not resolve the 56-year-old Naga political issue. Because
the "core issue" of the Naga people is "unequivocally upholding the
sovereignty of Nagaland," she told in an exclusive interview to Oken Jeet
Sandham from her London NNC Office.
Excerpts from the interview:
n What is your first reaction to
the recent visit of the Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee to Nagaland?
What do you see his remarks that Nagas have unique history?
Adino Phizo: Nagaland is not for sale. Instead of
meeting the genuine Naga representatives and find out what the Naga people
think of India, he confined his visit to meeting the converted and cheer
crowds transported from Manipur state. My people told me that the visit is
seen by the vast majority of the Naga people as nothing more than rewarding
the current puppet state government for accommodating BJP — the Hindu
nationalist party who for one moment could not have imagined to set foot in
Nagaland.
From the outset of bringing together the Naga people, our
leader A.Z. Phizo emphasised our unique history. He was the author of modern
Nagaland so his authority on the subject could not be challenged by the Indian
leaders as it was based on historical facts. The Nagas in the first place, did
not share a common history with India, and secondly, had no treaty with
foreigners, including the British imperialists, who made peace with his
Khonomas’ ancestors. On Prime Minister Vajpayee’s recent visit, it will be
seen as a positive step if he is sincere in what he commented on the bilateral
issues during his public address in Kohima.
n The Naga people had initial
expectation from the Prime Minister that he would announce something
significant with respect to peace process rather he announced a huge economic
package. Will the package bring any change in the mindset of the Naga people?
The informed Naga people were not aware that the Indian
Prime Minister would be bringing with him any surprise package in connection
with the "peace process." They are somewhat surprised and bemused at the
tenacity of India that the stage-managed goings-on have not broken up!
Hitherto, India’s hypocritical policy towards Nagaland is not compatible with
"peace process."
It is not the first time that India tested the resolve of
the Naga people by offering financial incentive to join India. The former
Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru sent his trusted Minister Sri Prakasa
to meet the Naga leader A.Z. Phizo on 7 July1951 and offered a "blank cheque"
to enter any amount for the development of Nagaland. It was not accepted and
according to B.N. Mullik, Indian Intelligence Chief, the shocked Indian Prime
Minister thought the Naga leader was a crank! No sensible Naga is likely to be
too impressed by the recent promise of Rs. 1050 crore financial package
because it smells political bribe. The opportunist Nagas will no doubt see it
as BJP baksheesh but Nagaland cannot be bought.
n Now the core issue of the Naga
people is seemingly changing that is from "Sovereignty to Naga integration"
What do you say on this?
The core issue of the Naga people is unequivocally
upholding the sovereignty of Nagaland. On the question of Naga integration,
NNC has been consistent with its stand on unqualified membership for the Naga
people. By virtue of this, the Naga people look upon NNC as the embodiment of
Naga body politic and it reflects the aspirations of the people.
"Naga integration" or "greater Nagaland" is a flowery
slogans adopted by a section of political misfits to deflect from the real
issue. Cheap rhetoric on peripheral issues without Naga sovereignty makes
little sense. Nagaland already is an integrated nation enshrined in the
Yehzabo (Constitution) of Nagaland.
n As often said, "Without
integration, no solution." But the question is "Doesn’t the Naga sovereignty
issue encompasses all Nagas?"
The issue of "Naga integration" is simply a red herring.
There can be only one solution to the conflict between the two nations and
that is, the unconditional total withdrawal of Indian army and its camp
followers from Nagaland. The vast majority of sensible Naga people deeply
resent the unreasonable interference by a section that were not known or seen
to have participated in the Naga national cause.
NNC and the Federal Government of Nagaland are totally
committed to the democratic wishes of the Naga people. But sovereignty cannot
be imposed on the unwilling, for instance, some Nagas from Manipur who
sought-after and joined NNC in 1964 later appeared to have an identity crisis.
A section of them broke away and in blatant contravention of Naga Yehzabo call
themselves among others United Naga Council and NSCN (IM). Surely for them and
their collaborators who now cry for "integration" is a self-contradiction.
n Do you think Indian Prime
Minister’s assertion that there is a need to evolve a political consensus in
the region for redrawing state boundaries as far as Naga integration is
concerned?
NNC has been consistent on the issue of Naga territories
arbitrarily removed ostensibly for "administrative convenience" during the
British India regime in the 19th century. Naga oral tradition supported by the
British survey records gives a clear historical picture of the Naga
territories before and after it had been changed. Broadly speaking, the Naga
territories, which now form part of the states of Assam and Manipur, were not
included in the then the "Naga Hills" in order to establish a "buffer zone"
for protecting the British commercial interest.
Vajpayee’s comment on the need to evolve a political
consensus on the issue of Naga integration may carry more than one
interpretation but if taken uncritically, it can be a positive development.
NNC view the current frenzy rhetoric for "Naga integration" by some unelected
politically naive Nagas unhelpful. However, once normalcy returns, it will be
amicably settled through proper dialogue. |