|
Will Indo-Russian defence ties
survive
The
bear hug appears to be losing its warmth and it is time for India also
to become realistic about relationships. There was a time when the
Soviet Union provided for our defence needs virtually at cost price but
now with its break up and the emergence of new Russia, things have
changed. India too needs to change and take effective steps to involve
the private industry in catering to the needs of the country’s defence.
by BRIJ BHARDWAJ
There is a growing sense
of uneasiness in Indian defence forces over the problems they are facing
with Russia in respect of supply of
armaments from that
country which has been its mainstay in the past. Even today close to
eighty per cent equipment is sourced from that country. Problems do not
relate to any single arm but cover all three including Army, Navy and
Air force.
The snags relating to
delays in supply of equipment to Navy are well known. The controversy
relating to supply of aircraft carrier at present being retrofitted in
Russian shipyard has become a scandal which provoked Naval Chief Sureesh
Mehta to go public and virtually went to the extent of reading the riot
act to Russians and saying that they have to fulfill their obligations
in terms of contract and their demand for one billion additional U.S
dollars will mean virtually doubling the price, which was not
acceptable.
The fact the carrier
Gorshkov will come to us after a crucial delay of many years is bad
enough, but the price hike makes it a bad bargain. It seems that
Russians have forgotten that their shipyard had no work and it was
Indian money which made it possible to reequip their shipyard and get
fresh orders which has changed the economy of that area. It is no secret
that Russians are no longer dependent on defence contracts to keep their
defence industries running as they are flushed with the income from sale
of petroleum products.
Indian problems are not
limited to single aircraft carrier. According to other reports confirmed
by naval staff, the missiles supplied by them to Navy are proving to be
duds as they do not hit the targets being short in range as well in
accuracy. According to a defence expert we are luckey that no war is on
because some of the missiles supplied to Army and Air Force also are
suffering from flaws making their deployment difficult.
The idea is not to run
down Russian cooperation and help in the past which was crucial at that
time because no other country was willing to give us hardware for our
defence forces. Countries like Britain and France did supply some planes
and other crucial weapons but they were only a trickle as major stores
came from Soviet Union. Some of them were given to us almost at cost
price and with long term credits.
The scenario has
virtually changed after Soviet Union disintegrated and new Russia was
born. No one expected that the special relationship will continue.
Payments for Russian equipment continued to rise and had to be made in
Dollars or now in Euros as green bucks have been on decline. But big
question facing us is how far we can depend on equipment from Russia. We
are tied with Russia to join hands to produce new transport aircraft,
fifth generation fighter plane and supply of nuclear submarines.
Agreed that the
Government of India is not prepared to just withdraw from major
engagement with Russia, but it can not be denied that we are facing
problems. Not only cost of all projects are being hiked, but we also
have major problems with respect of spares which in many cases force us
to order some extra pieces, so that same can be cannibalized in case we
run short of spares. The deal under a cloud relates to fighter Sukhoi
for which a contract was signed long time ago as well as new generation
of battle tanks. How many deals will survive is difficult to predict as
two countries have very deep bonds in the field of defense, trade and in
international affairs.
Any new course of action
will not be easy. True that India is in position to buy arms from
different sources to which two important countries have been added they
are Israel and USA. But a change will not be easy and will take years
before a full changeover is made. One also feels that present problems
notwithstanding Russia will not like to lose its second most important
market for arms in the world after China.
There are obvious lessons
to be learnt. India has been trying to become self-sufficient in the
field of arms for a long time, but the progress so far is not much. Our
public sector undertakings have worked on foreign designs and parts to
assemble them, but our ability to produce same in India has been rather
dismal with key projects suffering from delays ranging in decades.
There is time to take a
new look. Our decision to call for 50 percent offset in defense deals
and to involve private sector are steps in right direction. The pace of
absorbing new technologies will have to be enlarged and investment in
research and development hiked. The present disappointments offer us
opportunities which may help us in future. In new thinking we need not
reinvent the wheel. For instance time has come to think of missiles and
unmanned aircraft instead of fifth generation fighter planes. |