|
|
| |
JK Tyre disagrees, writes to ASCI
JK Tyre has disagreed with the
decision of the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) that the
claim "JK Tyre—The No 1 Tyre Manufacturer" in an advertising campaign of
the company was "misleading" (The Dayafter, January 1 2003
). According to company sources, "JK Tyre—The No 1 Tyre
Manufacturer" was a plank in their communication strategy, that was
stopped in May 2002. The campaign does not exist anymore. The company
has now written to ASCI on December 16 clarifying their position on the
objections raised.
According to sources, the contention of the
complainant is wrong. ASCI’s latest verdict contradicts its own stand
taken in May when it held that the same headline was not misleading, say
company sources.
The complaining company’s letter to ASCI on December
16 stated that the "complainant is feeling threatened by our superior
status and is, therefore, time and again resorting to such tactics
without checking the relevant figures".
JK Tyre has also pointed out that the company
manufactures JK branded tyres through the Vikrant production facility
and, therefore, for all practical purposes, JK Tyre and Vikrant Tyre has
to be looked at together.
According to sources, even ATMA clubs JK and Vikrant
numbers.
As regards the contention of MRF that the turnover
figures from audited financial statements can only be considered as
authentic and not ATMA production numbers, company sources said that the
turnover of MRF included a number of segments such as paints, industrial
rubber products, toys and 2-wheeler and 3-wheeler tyres which need to be
excluded before making any comparison with JK and Vikrant, which are
manufacturers of only 4-wheeler tyres.
According to sources, ASCI had in May accepted ATMA
numbers in support of their decision that the heading "JK Tyre—No 1 Tyre
Manufacturer in India" was not false or misleading.
|
|
Aaj Tak English News Channel Starts Mid-February
TV Today Network is launching
an English News Channel in mid February, G. Krishnan, CEO & ED, TV Today
Network, said: "The channel is expected to start broadcasting by
mid-February 2003. The market is big, there is a 100 million
English-speaking audience, out of which about 60 million are in the
metros." The name of the English news channel has still not been
decided, Krishnan said.
Whether the English news channel will garner as good
viewership numbers as the Hindi news channel will only become clear with
time. However, with this launch, TV Today Network is likely to benefit
on other aspects of business.
According to some media analysts, the launch of
another news channel is supposed to put Aaj Tak in a stronger
bargaining position vis-à-vis bouquets in the market.
Also, it would be beneficial from the point of view
of gaining a greater share of advertising revenue. "The ad pie for the
news channel market is growing and is expected to reach Rs. 500 crore in
the next two years. Of this, we expect to garner a major share," says
Krishnan.
Following this, TV Today Network is planning to take
Aaj Tak to the NRI market in the U. S. A. and the U. K. The news
provided by Aaj Tak for the NRI market will be derived from Hindi
and English news channels in the Indian market.
|
|
Broadcasting Regulatory Bill on the anvil
The Information and
Broadcasting Ministry is finalising a Bill to regulate the broadcasting
sector with the aim of bringing in more efficiency and coherence in its
policies. According to sources, several laws governing the sector will
be part of the new legislation. The government is planning to draft the
new law by the end of 2003.
Some of the laws expected to be a part of the new
legislation are the Cable Television Regulation Act, the legislation
permitting direct-to-home (DTH) telecasting and the multiple guidelines
that regulate television content. However, the licensing powers will
rest with the Government.
The Bill will also specify the framework for the
setting up of a broadcasting council for content regulation on
television channels in view of the delay in the passage of the
Communications Convergence Bill.
The Bill will address the issues of public order and
decency, preservation of cultural diversity, prevention of excessive
depiction of sex and violence, national security, integrity and
sovereignty of the country and protection of children from undesirable
programmes and advertisements on various channels.
It will also provide powers to the council to form
programming codes for television channels as well as advertising on the
electronic media. Besides, the regulator will be given powers to
implement its guidelines as well as to penalise defaulters.
The Bill would cover all aspects of broadcasting,
including areas such as terrestrial broadcasting, satellite broadcasting
as well as DTH cable television distribution.
This is the second attempt by the government in the
past five years to introduce a comprehensive Bill to govern the
broadcasting sector. The last broadcast Bill was introduced in 1997 in
Parliament by the then Information and Broadcasting Minister Jaipal
Reddy, and dealt with every aspect of broadcasting in detail. The Bill
was not pursued in view of introducing the Communication Convergence
Bill. The 1997 Broadcast Bill categorically debarred foreign equity in
terrestrial broadcasting, while capping foreign direct investment in
other services at 49 per cent. It had also suggested cross-media
restrictions of 20 per cent, while stating that interested players could
obtain licences for only one type of service of the seven sought to be
licensed by the government.
|
|
Royalty blocks Readers Digest sale
Royalty payment to the U. S.
parent is believed to be the main issue holding up the Tatas’ plan to
sell the Indian Reader’s Digest to the Living Media group.
According to sources, Reader’s Digest Association Inc
is demanding a royalty of close to 12 per cent of the annual turnover
from the Living Media group.
Currently, the Tatas pay five per cent of sales
turnover as royalty to Reader’s Digest Association Inc, which holds the
copyright, trademark and dictates editorial content and policies for the
Indian edition.
Explaining the reasons for the delay in the sale,
officials said the royalty agreement being negotiated is for 10 years
and requires Government approval.
The sale of the business from the Tatas to the Living
Media group involves the entire publishing enterprise, which includes
the brand name, database, subscription list, advertisement contracts,
staff, office space and receivables of the organisation.
Apart from the publishing business, RDI Print &
Publishing also has an investment business, which would not be part of
the sale. The investments with a book value of close to Rs. 50 crore
include shareholding in several Tata companies and real estate.
The net profit of Reader’s Digest in India for
March 2002 was close to Rs. 4 crore with Rs. 14 crore income from
circulation and Rs. 7 crore from advertising revenue.
The exit of the Tatas from Reader’s Digest is
in line with the group’s strategy of exiting from non-core businesses as
it did in the case of Tomco, Merrind and Lakme to name a few.
The Tatas had bought 100 per cent stake in
Reader’s Digest back in 1979 for a ‘paltry’ sum of Rs. 1.5 lakh,
equivalent to the then paid-up capital of the company, at a time when
many foreign companies were exiting India to comply with the Foreign
Exchange Regulation Act .
|
|