|
India’s flawed diamond dream
It is no mean
achievement to outwit the Jews and this is exactly what the Indian
traders from Gujarat have achieved in the diamond cutting and polishing
business. Arriving in Antwerp only in 1970s, the Indians successfully
challenged them and by 1990s the Jews were ready to surrender. However,
it is unfortunate that this unheard of feat has not been suitably
rewarded by the Indian Government. Today these traders face the ill
effects of the rising value of the rupee.
by REPORTER@DAYAFTERINDIA.COM
India,
having elbowed aside Antwerp in the international diamond cutting and
polishing business, is looking to boot the Belgian city from its perch
as capital of the world’s diamond market.
About 80% of the world’s rough
diamonds and half its polished diamonds are bought and sold in Antwerp,
home to 1,500 retail and wholesale diamond companies and four diamond
exchanges. Six decades ago, the city was home to all the world’s diamond
exchanges. Four remain, while 20 have sprung up in other parts of the
world, including Dubai and Mumbai.
Indian traders arrived in Antwerp in
the mid-1970s, challenging the centuries-long control by Orthodox Jews
of the diamond trade there. By the 1990s, the Jews were ready to
surrender and Indians today account for two-thirds of Antwerp’s US$36
billion diamond trade, with the Jewish share of trade reduced to just
25% from 70% two decades ago.
The Indian diamantaires (as Antwerp’s
diamond traders are called) belong to a few hundred families, many
related by marriage, from the Jain community from Palanpur, a small
village in Gujarat. They are recognized for their entrepreneurial talent
and in a trade that runs on trust, the Indians - like the Jews before
them - have benefited from close family ties.
The Indian diamantaires started at the
bottom end of the business, working on low-quality rough diamonds that
existing big players weren’t interested in. Then they outsourced the
cutting and polishing business to India - the cost of labor was 80%
lower back home; the finishing work went to family-owned businesses in
Mumbai and the Gujarat port city of Surat. Larger profit margins enabled
the Indian diamantaires to invest and expand and they climbed the value
chain, buying and selling pricier stones until they soon overtook their
Jewish counterparts in the trade.
Yet even with Indians dominating the
trade in Antwerp, the city’s decision-making business councils remained
elusive to them for several years. That began changing in 2003 when two
Indian diamantaires were elected to Antwerp’s High Diamond Council, the
governing body of the city’s diamond industry. In 2006, Indians won five
of the six elected seats on the 11-member board.
Surat meanwhile emerged as the center
of the diamond cutting and polishing business, to the point that 92% of
the world’s diamonds are now cut and polished there and the 800,000
workers involved earned India $11 billion in exports last year. Antwerp
now has a bare 800 cutters and polishers, down from 25,000 in the 1970s.
Having eclipsed Antwerp in the cutting
and polishing business, Indian diamond traders want to make Mumbai the
world’s diamond hub. They have the backing of the Indian government,
which announced zero duty on import of polished diamonds last year, when
almost $2 billion worth of cut and polished diamonds were imported. That
will give a further boost to the diamond jewelry-making business.
The Reserve Bank of India, meanwhile,
is helping traders by allowing advance payment without any bank
guarantee for procurement of rough diamonds from five miners - Rio Tinto,
BHP, Angola’s Endiama, and Russia’s Alrosa and Gokhran. The commerce
ministry has also held talks with governments of diamond mining
countries to secure a stead long-term supply of roughs - or uncut
stones.
The Bharat Diamond Bourse, a single
window operation facility and dedicated custom house to boost trade, is
being built. Intended to be among the most modern and secure diamond
trading hubs in Asia, it is being touted as India’s answer to the
Antwerp Diamond Center.
The purchase of diamonds direct from
miners helps to reduce India’s dependence on trading hubs other than
Antwerp, such as London, and cut intermediary costs, while it may help
to ensure long-term supplies from Russia and mining countries in Africa,
at the same time reducing the role of the sales and marketing arm of
South African giant De Beers, the Diamond Trading Corporation, which
controls 80% of global trade in rough diamonds.
In 2006, Diamond India Limited, which
consists of members of the diamond trade, was set up to source and
procure roughs directly from Russia, Botswana, South Africa, Angola and
others and sell them to Indian manufacturers.
Import of rough diamonds from Russia
has already started. The purchases are being made from state-owned
Russian firms such as Alrosa and Gokhran. According to reports, Indian
importers have been ordering diamonds worth about $10 million to $12
million directly from Russia and that amount could soar. “We are ready
to buy up to $1 billion worth of diamonds annually from Russia,” Praveen
Shankar Pandya, convenor for rough sourcing at the Gems and Jewelry
Export Promotion Council, has said.
To encourage stronger partnerships in
Africa, India will offer in return for uncut stones training in diamond
cutting and polishing and help to build local industries by providing
technical assistance.
All that, however, may not be enough
to overcome the obstacles standing between India’s diamond firms and
their dreams. Not least is the country’s own bureaucracy, typified by
the lethargic progress of the Bharat Diamond Bourse project. Perhaps as
damaging, industry watchers say the diamond industry in Mumbai is not
transparent, with hawala transactions (or informal value transfer
systems) common, while security is far from what is available at other
trading centers.
The involvement in the trade of
numerous government officials adds to costs and inefficiency. Instead of
a one-window interaction with the government, diamond companies in India
have to deal with multiple ministries and at central, state and local
level. Value added tax has to be paid - only to be returned, though only
after the government has held on to it for a while; diamond traders
complain this is effectively a block on funds.
Recent developments have also taken
the polish from India’s ambitions. The supply of roughs is slowing and
likely to worsen following a decision by De Beers to cut out several
Indian sightholders (clients) under its global rough diamond
distribution plan. A strengthening rupee and the economic slowdown in
the US too have taken their toll.
The rupee gained against the world’s
leading currencies last year, notably 12.3% against the US dollar,
undermining the competitiveness of India’s diamond jewelry exports.
Exports to the US, which accounted for 60% of diamonds exported from
India in the 2006-07 financial year, fell almost 50% from 12 months
earlier, a decline aggravated by a 6.5% import duty on diamond jewelry
from India though not applicable to countries like Thailand.
The impact on orders has been felt in
the polishing business, with around 2,000 polishing units in Surat being
closed in recent months, according to business daily, Mint, citing
Pravin Nanavaty, a member of the Gujarat Hira Bourse, an association of
diamond traders from that region.
African diamond producing countries
are meanwhile considering imposing exports duties of 5-7%, which will
drive up the cost for Indian imports of roughs; at the same time African
producers are demanding that polishing units be set up on their soil,
which will force the further closure or relocation of Surat’s polishing
units. India’s share of the diamond processing business, which stands at
57% now (in value terms), could shrink to 49% by 2015, according to a
survey by consulting firm KPMG,
India’s polishers also face
intensifying competition from other countries. China is expanding its
cutting and polishing business, and with over 30,000 polishers stands
second only to India. It has been processing larger diamonds for jewelry
making and importing roughs worth about $1 billion a year. Several
Indian companies have in fact set up polishing units in south China.
Dubai is also challenging India’s
ambitions, attracting diamond traders with new facilities and incentives
such as tax holidays. Helping the Gulf state, and unlike Antwerp which
is bound by EU rules, Dubai is far more lenient regarding the transfer
of money.
The progress of Dubai’s Almas
(Diamond) Tower perhaps best captures the difference in ambition and
determination between the two country’s diamond businesses. Work on the
Almas Tower began in 2005; it was completed on schedule in December. In
comparison, Mumbai’s Bharat Diamond Bourse, conceived in 1992 and due to
be completed in 1996, has yet to get off the ground. The new deadline
for the bourse’s opening is early 2009. |