|
Enough of the smaller parties?
Ever since the era of
coalition governments has come to stay the clout of the smaller parties
has grown, disproportionate to the support they have from the
electorate, especially of those that choose to remain out of government.
This has often meant the arm twisting of the government without any
accountability and stalling of policies and programs that are essential
for the speedy development of the country.
by BRIJ BHARDWAJ
Marginal
parties in India have wielded influence and power far beyond their
numbers in Parliament as well as support among the electorates during
the last one decade. This came about when coalitions replaced one party
rule at Center as no single party was in apposition to form a Government
on its own and needed help of different parties to build a simple
majority in Lok Sabha. This combination included a large number of
groups numbering close to double figure. Some of these parties had
support in double figure while there were many with two or three
members. Most of them, however had to be provided berths in the council
of Ministers.
The real power was
exercised by groups which chose to stay out of council of ministers and
lent support from outside. In case of National Democratic Alliance led
Government with Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee as Prime Minister this role was
played by Telugu Desam and AI-ADMK. In one case AI-ADMK brought about
the fall of the Government and the country had to go for fresh
elections. In the case of TDP, the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh Mr.
Chandrababu Naidu, used his power base to get goodies for his state in
term of more funds and placing officials from the State in key positions
at Center.
This trend has continued
in the UPA era where the Left parties with support of around sixty
members and five per cent vote base have exercised the kind of veto
power in a manner that makes one wonder if such combinations are the
answer to problem created by national parties base shrinking and rise of
regional parties. In all these combinations the regional interest
override national priorities, but in case of Left parties the problem is
created by their ideological commitments to a system which has lost
ground in countries of its origin, but Indian Left remains committed to
its outdated ideas like working extra hard to get benefits for the white
collared workers employed in State sector and middle class in cities
while ignoring the real poor living in unorganized sector in cities and
landless farmers in rural areas.
More so they have
virtually used their veto to stop the process of economic reforms. It is
this veto which has prevented the Government from selling off loss
making public sector undertakings, labour reforms or pension reforms.
They have refused to see the writing on the wall that no country can
afford to allow the pension payments to get very close to the total
salary bill. They have also been insisting that rate of interest to be
paid on Provident fund account be maintained at levels which have no
link with the interest earned by citizens from normal channels like
banks. The proposals like allowing investment of funds collected in such
schemes in private sector to earn more have been put on hold under
pressure of Left leaders. Same is true in case of labour reforms.
The Left has refused to
see that the country economy has started growing by eight to nine per
cent and be counted among the countries which have highest growth rate
and are expected to become major players in world economy because of
reforms. This process could have been given a further push but the
Government has been overtaken by a come induced by Left leader. This
veto has not only been limited to economic front but has also made us
Vunerable in our dealings with foreign countries. For instance the left
leaders would like us to support Iran which provided safe heaven to
Pakistan Air Force during 1971 war and gave them critical supplies and
to dump Israel which has been providing us tactical support by helping
in the process of modernization of our security forces. The supply of
missiles, unmanned aircraft and other critical equipment has made our
defenses strong. For instance if left to the communist they would like
us to stop sending. Israel satellites into space which help us to earn
lot of money because of their concern for Arab friends who despite
support given to them on issue of Palestine support Pakistan in meetings
of Islamic countries by condemning India on Kashmir issue.
While talking about their
strong objection to Indo-US treaty for use of nuclear energy for
civilian purposes, one can not help but point out that flag carriers or
home of left regime in the past that is Russia and China are a part of
Nuclear Supply group which is responsible for isolating India on the
nuclear front by denying us the technology as well as heavy water or
uranium necessary to keep our nuclear power plants running. Both these
countries have told us that unless treaty is finalized and India signs
agreements with IAEA and Nuclear supply group no help is possible.
But these considerations
carry no weight with Left Leaders most of whom have never fought a
direct election and live in ivory towers of their own. In this context
whispers heard in some quarters are that time has come when two national
parties should seriously think about joining hands to carry this nation
forward instead of allowing themselves to be blackmailed by marginal
players. It will not be easy but one seriously hopes that at some stage
either political sense will prevail for such a combination or people
will get fed up with the coalition politics and give working majority to
one of the large national parties. As otherwise the progress of the
country will be in serious danger. |