|
|
There is cause for concern on the financial front in
the States slated to go to the polls this month and later, as they
are facing a severe financial crunch, the impact of which may be
felt in their annual plans in the coming budget.
Empty coffers and heavy loan liabilities await
the new government in Himachal Pradesh, which faces elections on
February 26. With the tiny State on the verge of a debt trap,
reports say it is going to be difficult for any government to get
the State’s economy back on the rails. Official sources in the State
have said the State’s loan burden swelled to over Rs. 13,000 crore.
Himachal is facing a deficit of Rs. 2,381 crore in its budget in the
current financial year and the shortfall is being met with
borrowings. Worse still, the State’s annual plan showed no increase
from Rs. 1,700 crore for two consecutive years, with the Government
failing to mobilise resources. Another headache is salaries, with
the Government doling out nearly Rs. 1,600 crore to over three lakh
employees.
In Maharashtra, the newly-appointed Chief
Minister, Sushil Kumar Shinde, has inherited a huge State debt
running into thousands of crores. This debt is likely to touch Rs.
81,000 crore at the end of the current financial year and in all
probability will increase to Rs. 1,00,000 crore by mid-2004,
according to a medium fiscal term responsibility estimate prepared
by the Maharashtra Government. In addition, funds budgeted for
welfare and development schemes were diverted to fund populist
decisions based on political needs, it has been pointed out.
The next financial year will be the worst as the
State Government will have to make the maximum repayment ever for
all the loans it has taken over the years. The amount to be repaid
has been estimated at Rs. 13,000 crore. Observers point out that the
Vilasrao Deshmukh government has been a major victim of politically
motivated populist decisions which have had a tremendous impact on
the State exchequer. Political leaders in the State have pointed out
that the Government’s debts went up to Rs. 81,000 crore due to a
variety of reasons. Amongst them were political decisions that
included bailing out the Maharashtra State Electricity Board at a
cost of Rs. 7,000 crore and Rs. 4,500 crore for the cotton monopoly
scheme. It is likely to require another Rs. 200 crore for the onion
crisis.
The State Finance Minister said in 1995, when the
Sharad Pawar-led Congress Government demitted office, that the State
had a surplus of Rs. 250 crore. When the Shiv Sena-BJP Government
lost power in 1999, they left behind a debt of Rs. 49,000 crore and
several incomplete infrastructure and irrigation projects. In three
years, the Deshmukh government had repaid Rs. 27,000 crore as
interest and Rs. 5,300 crore as principal. Since the loans taken by
the earlier alliance government were at a very high interest rate,
without any call options and for a period of five to seven years, it
has led to a debt cycle. Implementation of the Fifth Pay Commission
report, too, had cost the Government Rs. 4,000 crore annually.
The Central Government is said to be
Maharashtra’s biggest moneylender . But though the Reserve Bank of
India has, over the past couple of years, reduced interest rates, it
has refused to allow the benefit to Maharashtra. The State has been
paying 11.5 per cent interest on its loans. This year, the State has
budgeted Rs. 1,413 crore as principal amount and Rs. 7,000 crore as
interest to be repaid to the Centre . Considering the State’s
delicate financial condition, the State authorities opted for
financial restructuring with World Bank help. But that clearance,
too, has not come.
On its part, the Centre is unlikely to take a
lenient or generous view of the States’ demand for funds. With a
massive fiscal deficit on his doorstep, Finance Minister Jaswant
Singh is likely to maintain a tight-fisted approach to most of the
demands of Central Ministries and State Governments in his first
budget to be presented this month.
The problem of financing the Central Ministries
and the States’ annual plans arises from differences between the
Planning Commission and the Finance Ministry on the size of the
gross budgetary support (GBS) that the next general budget would
commit. While the Planning Commission has sought an allocation of Rs.
1,34,060 crore, Finance Minister Singh has, in a communication, made
it clear that an allocation of this magnitude is most unlikely.
Planning Commission officials indicate that the delay in
finalisation of GBS has resulted in delaying the finalisation of the
States’ annual plans. These plans are usually taken up for
confirmation and finalisation between the States and the Commission
from the middle of December, the exercise attaining completion in
February, so that the States are in a position to present realistic
budgets for the next financial year. This year, the exercise has
been delayed and the States would have to be vague about
developmental projects they intend to take up in the next fiscal.
Central Ministries have already put in demands totalling about Rs.
74,000 crore, higher than the Rs.67,000 crore allocated in
2002-2003. It is likely, therefore, that the States will suffer for
no fault of their own, despite elections looming large in the
none-too-distant horizon. |