|
|
 |
|
|
|
A shame that dogs the nation
by Brij Bhardwaj
Every
time some new evidence emerges to indicate the complicity of Narendra
Modi and his government in the Gujrat riots the BJP and its allies rake
up the anti-Sikh riots of 1984. There is little doubt that both stand
out as a shame that the nation finds hard to wipe out but the need for a
secular party like Congress is to ensure that the guilty of anti-Sikh
riots are brought to justice as soon as possible.
There are few incidents in the history of a nation for which people as
well few connected with incidents are always ashamed and would like to
forget them and if possible make amends for them. The riots in Gujarat
and anti Sikh riots in Delhi fall in the category of such incidents. The
nation has been trying to overcome the trauma caused by these incidents
, but the ugly memories are revived again and again and keep on haunting
the guilty persons of anti-Sikh riots and communal incidents in Gujarat.
The gruesome details of Gujarat riots were revived recently when a sting
operation was conducted by a group of TV channels and Tehelka group
which had been in the forefront of such operations for a long time. The
sting operation was significant not for providing any further details
about the incidents when the peaceful state of Gujarat had become play
ground for devil, but more disgusting was the fact showing some odd
balls involved in the violence instead of having any remorse or guilt
feelings for participation in such incidents boasting about their crimes
and atrocities committed by them. Another highlight of the operation was
the fact that guilty stated leaving little doubts that they were
encouraged in committing the crimes by persons in authority, thus
exposing a nexus which has been known, but could not be proved so far.
The Bhartiya Janata Dal which was obviously embarrassed tried to get out
of the tight situation by questioning the motives as well as timing of
the sting operations but was aware of the fact that they have been
caught on the wrong foot. Particularly on the eve of fresh polls in
Gujarat where BJP is facing a tough challenge from opponents as well as
from dissidents within their own ranks. So it chose to attack the
Congress for their involvement in Anti-Sikh riots in Delhi. This
certainly makes sense politically, but one would like to ask if one
wrong can be an excuse for the subsequent wrong.
More so there are two basic differences between the two ugly incidents.
In the first instance while the communal divide in Delhi has been
healed, it remains intact in Gujarat. Second major difference is that
all those involved in Delhi incidents have been sent into oblivion
either by natural causes like death or through action taken by political
bosses who felt that such people have become a political liability. Few
have been punished by law courts but number of such people remains very
small and one could concede that despite assurances the State machinery
has not moved fast enough to punish the guilty as compared to the
gruesome tragedy enacted in Delhi
On the other hand in Gujarat, the main actors responsible for the acts
of commission or omission are not only active but remain at the helm of
affairs in the State. For instance the State Chief Minister Narendra
Modi who is held responsible for allowing the riots to continue and for
having made the State machinery inactive while mobs were out seeking
revenge for the alleged attack on Hindu pilgrims in Godhra is seeking a
new term to rule the State. The question being asked is can the wounds
inflicted by senseless riots ever be healed as long as Mr Modi remains
in power and as Chief Minister.
Mr Modi does not offer any defence for his role except to state that he
has the support of majority in the State. Does it implies that a popular
following or a verdict in elections is enough to allow all those guilty
of crimes, irrespective of the nature of offence can go free. More over
the presence of Mr Modi not only absolves him of any guilt but also
those who had taken part in the riots encouraged by those who wielded
power at that time. Many pronouncements made by courts in the country
leave little doubt that Gujarat is one case where more needs to be done.
To start with the moderates in BJP should seriously think if the image
projected by Mr Modi and others who have boasted on camera about their
participation in gruesome crimes should remain connected with them or
not. A national party which has also boasted of being a party with
difference as they enforce a better code of conduct on their members
needs to change its image. Mr Modi probably offers them some electoral
advantage in Gujarat, but is certainly a handicap when it comes to
making them more acceptable to country at large.
Bhartiya Janta Party under the leadership of Mr Atal Bihari Vajpayee had
tried to project the soft face of the party instead of being a die hard
Hindu party wedded to outdated ideology. If the leadership chooses to
ignore these facts, it would be responsible for being pushed back into a
corner instead of emerging as a mainstream political force. As for the
Congress, it has its commitment to secularism as a central focal point
of its political philosophy as such it must do more to bring the guilty
of anti-Sikh riots before legal forums to be punished and suffer for
their acts. The action taken so far is certainly not convincing. As for
the nation it must think and devise ways so that such incidents are not
repeated which bring shame to the nation and undermines our secular and
democratic credentials. |
|
|
|