Some
fairly authentic reports are now available to indicate that the
Election Commission would have suspended the polls in Gujarat if the
State Government had not stopped the Vijay Yatra. The Vishwa Hindu
Parishad (VHP) had planned to lead it nearly three weeks ago with a
replica of the charred coach of the Sabarmati Express at Godhra.
Whether or not the Supreme Court’s directive not to stall the polls
on the ground of law and order would have come in the way of the
Election Commission is difficult to say. After making it the sole
arbiter of deciding when to hold the election, the Supreme Court’s
order would have been, at best, a subject for interpretation. But
that eventuality never arose. Protection of the Constitution does
not relate to the law and order problem.
In any case, the Gujarat Government considered it
prudent to arrest some VHP leaders to stall the yatra. The manner in
which the VHP was ticked off and the precautionary measures taken by
the State, however reluctantly, should have chastened Chief Minister
Narendra Modi. But the Gujarat election campaign showed that he went
to the farthest limit to break every rule, written or unwritten,
legal or moral. His speeches reflected disdain for the Election
Commission or, for that matter, any institution. He is a law unto
himself. The sum total of Modi’s efforts has been to turn the
election in the State into an exercise in obscurantism so as to
consolidate the Hindu vote.
The word ‘mian’, which he affixed to the name of
President Pervez Musharraf, is meant to deride the Indian Muslims
and placate the Hindu elements for whom it is a word of contempt.
Muslims are hardly a political force in the State. They are not more
than 11 per cent of the electorate. But Modi believed that by
inculcating an anti-Muslim feeling, he could ride a pro-Hindu wave.
The Election Commission stepped in at times to ensure that the polls
were free and fair. It has stopped the use of Home Guards for
election duties because most of them are RSS camp followers. The
Commission had also taken adverse note of the wide distribution of
propaganda compact discs and T-shirts depicting the Godhra train
burning. In Ahmedabad, the Commission had parts of hoardings pulled
down because the text read: "Be it Godhra or Akshardham (temple), we
will wipe out terrorism."
Still, the Election Commission has limitations.
Its major source of information is the State. It cannot run the
administration that is under Modi. By the time the reports reached
Delhi, the damage had already been done. Even otherwise, the
Commission can do little when the ruling party in the State and at
the Centre is bent upon communalising the atmosphere. The Sangh
parivar has staked all in the Gujarat election to make it a
referendum on Hindutva. If it fails, it may take the parivar many
years to recover. But if it succeeds, it may be emboldened to take
on the pluralistic society in other parts of the country. It is a
disturbing scenario for the future. To some, it may seem farfetched.
But that’s what emerges when one does a reality check. The VHP, the
Taliban arm of the RSS, is calling all the shots. The BJP is toeing
the line. The VHP shows the crude and militant side of Hindutva
while the BJP is its camouflage. They are two sides of the same
coin.
The other members of the Sangh parivar are in no
way less fanatic and fundamentalist than the deeni
(religious) parties in Pakistan or Bangladesh. The Prime Minister
had said that governance and economic development would be the poll
issues, not Godhra. But, apparently, he could not make the Sangh
parivar accept that plank. Otherwise, how do you explain the
election propaganda material--calendars, handbills, posters,
stickers, CDs and almanacs--all replete with images of the burning
Sabarmati Express bogie?
Vajpayee has used the Congress reference to the
publication of a White Paper on Godhra and the promise to punish the
guilty to break his pre-poll assurance not to bring in Godhra.
Assuming the Congress is a violator, there is no justification for
unleashing the most pernicious propaganda against the Muslims and
even offering justification for the Gujarat carnage. At one time, it
was said that the Prime Minister was so disgusted with the VHP
campaign that he had decided not to go to Gujarat. But this frame of
mind did not last long because he openly said later that he would go
to Gujarat if anybody called him (agar koyi bulayaga). The
RSS, which now controls all the elections from behind the scenes,
has obliged him. The Congress ‘crime’ cannot be the ground for the
Prime Minister joining the divisive and parochial forces.
L. K. Advani has thrown every caution to the
wind. He should know that he is India’s Home Minister, not the
Gujarat Chief Minister’s drumbeater. How can he give Modi a clean
chit when the Government-appointed Nanavati Commission is sitting
and recording evidence on what happened in Gujarat and who was
guilty? When the Home Minister declares Modi not guilty, the entire
purpose of the Commission is defeated. If the Commission does not
clear Modi, he can proclaim the Chief Minister’s innocence on the
basis of the Home Minister’s certificate. In fact, the Concerned
Citizens Tribunal, with retired Supreme Court and High Court judges
as its members, has already indicted Modi. Its two-volume report,
entitled Crime Against Humanity, tells how the misuse of
religion for political ends resulted in the Gujarat carnage. The
tribunal says: "Hindutva barbarians came out on the streets in
different parts of Gujarat and, in all flaming fury, targeted
innocent and helpless Muslims who had nothing to do with the
antecedent Godhra event. They were brutalised by miscreants
uninhibited by the police; their women were unblushingly molested;
and Muslim men, women and children, in a travesty of justice, were
burnt alive. The Chief Minister, oath-bound to defend law and order,
vicariously connived at the inhuman violence and some of his
Ministers even commanded the macabre acts of horror."
Still, the Home Minister praised Modi for the
"exemplary handling" of the riots! Unfortunately, the Congress, too,
is using sadhus and sants lest it should be seen not to have the
support of religious leaders. Congress President Sonia Gandhi
started the campaign after invoking blessings in temples. These
acts, too, are reprehensible. I do not know how the Gujaratis will
ultimately vote. But the election campaign is a warning to the
nation: there is no compunction in mixing religion with politics.
The entire structure of the polity is in danger if this trend is not
ruthlessly stopped. The adherents of theocracy will devour
democracy. In no part of the world is one nationality and one
religion synonymous; nor has it ever been so in India.
Since 10 more State elections are due in the next
12 to 15 months, there should be ground rules on their conduct. The
Election Commission alone cannot check the prejudices and passions
which are sought to be raised during the poll campaign.
Gujarat is an example where even Mahatma Gandhi’s
name was dragged in to abuse India’s pluralistic ethos. Political
parties have to adhere to certain discipline. Can they mix religion
with politics, something which endangers the very basic structure of
the Constitution? The ruling BJP has a lot to answer in this regard.