|
In
Gangtok recently, I was walking along one of the main bazaars of
Sikkim’s fast-growing capital city and was impressed by an imposing
show-room displaying motorcycles, scooters and other Indian products
of attractive designs and brands. But I was not so much attracted by
the products as to the signboard prominently displayed. It read "Sikkim-Tibet
Trade Company". Who were the traders with Tibet? That was the question
that arose first in my mind? Were they Tibetans, Sikkimese or mainland
Indians? I put the questions back in a recess of my mind for further
investigation. In a few minutes, I was scheduled to meet Pawan Kumar
Chamling, the Chief Minister of Sikkim, at his official residence,
Mintokgang, along with a select group of mediapersons from Delhi and
Siliguri, for an press-interaction. Also present was Mahendra P. Lama,
a reputed professor of the Jawaharlal Nehru University, who is also a
member of the Sikkim State Planning Commission with the ranking of a
Minister of State.
I broached the question: "I saw a showroom board
just before I came to see you. It said 'Sikkim-Tibet Trade Company'.
What is the complexion and volume of Sikkim-Tibet trade and is it a
public-sector undertaking?"
Chief Minister Chamling smiled in his
characteristic manner and said: "There is virtually no Sikkim-Tibet
trade these days, but once it was flourishing. The showroom signboard
you saw was of a company owned by an Indian Sikkimese. They have kept
the showroom intact, hoping that some day that booming trade might be
revived."
Later investigation showed that the company
belonged to Motilal Lakhotia, an Indian businessman, who in the true
Marwari tradition, had landed in the erstwhile kingdom of Sikkim,
ruled by the Chogyals then, and stayed there to continue with his
business. In the wake of the successful "Handshake Across the
Himalayas" between India and China, at the initiative of Indian Prime
Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee, it seemed that Lakhotia’s Marwari
instinct was vindicated.
During the interaction at Mintokgang, Chief
Minister Chamling was drawn into the prospects of the opening of the
Silk Route and Tibet-India trade with focus on the Nathu La route, the
nearest drive to China from India and also the route of the Old Yatung
and Tsomga region between Sikkim and Tibet.
When Pawan Chamling was asked for his reaction
towards the possibilities of the Vajpayee visit to Beijing opening the
window on Sikkim-Tibet trade, he said: "That has been our demand for
many years. We shall be too happy if the Silk Route opens. It will
benefit both Tibet and Sikkim".
The Chief Minister was asked whether the opening of
this trade route, which might result in large traffic of goods and
businesspersons across one of the highest trade routes in the world,
would not create some security problems too, he said: "That is a
matter that the Government of India will certainly take care of. We
always keep them informed about the situation."
It might be recalled that two questions uppermost
in the mind of observers of India-China relations before the Vajpayee
visit were whether India will formally affirm the Chinese claim over
the Tibetan autonomous region and whether China will reconcile itself
to the final and irrevocable accession of Sikkim to India, voluntarily
in 1975? The visit had proved that unlike Pakistan, China had shown
better statesmanship and recognised the signs and situation of the
times for building mutual relations with India.
In the wake of the Beijing declaration, setting a
new trend in India-China relations, the Sikkim Chief Minister was
among the first to welcome the accord. The estimated 500-million
dollar trade across the Nathu La window of the Silk Route, would
naturally change the lives of the half-a-million population of Sikkim
and would give advantages not only to Tibetan and Sikkimese traders
but also benefit Bengali traders right up to Kolkata.
Chamling had also raised the question, after the
Indian Prime Minister had mooted the bus to Lahore in his continuing
bid to improve relations with neighbours: "Why not a bus to Lhasa
now?" The demand seems to be attracting a lot of attention in the wake
of the ‘Himalayan handshake’. That might open up the Silk Route
through Nathu La as the world’s highest and most fascinating tourism
destination between India and China from Sikkim, the roof of India, to
Tibet, the roof of China.
During several conversations, formal and informal,
with Chief Minister Chamling, his views on Tibet-trade and the opening
of the Silk-Route became quite clear to me. He had always looked for
more than just trade with Tibet and China; in fact, he was keen on
restoring cultural ties between Lhasa and Gangtok too, through the bus
to Lhasa to begin with. That would in fact entail quite a few new
concepts of border management, security infrastructures and roads. He
felt that would lead to a lot of pilgrim tourism. Tourism would bring
in a lot more money.
It must be recalled that Chamling had already
outlined some very original ideas of developing rural and cultural
tourism destinations in Sikkim during his State Day message to his
people in May this year.
While the Vajpayee government has opened the
window, it is now for the government and people of Sikkim and
corporate India to take full advantage of the new opportunities and
open up new windows, may be full-fledged gates of India-China trade.
|