The 160-page report, which ranks 123 economies,
concludes that citizens and businesses in Africa, Latin America and
the former Soviet bloc comprise the least economically free countries
in the world, with Myanmar claiming the cellar position.
Besides the overall two winners, Asian countries
with high marks included Japan and South Korea, tied in 26th place;
Thailand (44); the Philippines (51); Malaysia (60); and Sri Lanka
(64). Besides Myanmar, the lowest-ranking Asian countries included
Indonesia (91), mainland China (100) and Pakistan (101). The report,
which was released on the same day as the United Nations’ celebrated
Human Development Index (HDI), is based on 38 variables in five major
categories designed to measure economic freedom.
The five categories include the size of government,
as determined in part by spending, taxes and state enterprises; the
legal structure and security of property rights; access to sound money
that is not weakened by high inflation rates; the freedom to exchange
goods and services with foreigners unencumbered, for example, by
tariffs or quotas or currency controls; and the degree to which
business and credit and labour markets are regulated by the
government.
The basic philosophy guiding the ratings is that of
classical economic liberalism or, as the third U. S. President, Thomas
Jefferson, famously put it: "That government is best which governs
least", except perhaps insofar as it actively protects
private-property rights. "Freeing people economically unleashes
individual drive and initiative and puts a nation on the road to
economic growth," said Nobel Economics laureate Milton Friedman, whose
basic economic ideas have acted as guideposts for the report and Cato
and the other think-tanks, including the Fraser Institute of Canada,
the F. A. Hayek Foundation in Slovakia, the Fundacion Libertad in
Argentina, the Centre for Civil Society in India, and the Institute
for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies in Israel. "In turn,
economic prosperity and independence from government promote civil and
political liberty."
At the same time, the study asserted that economic
freedom is highly correlated with per capita income, economic growth,
and life expectancy and does not necessarily lead to greater income
inequality.
Of course, not everyone agrees with this rosy
assessment. For years, civil-society organisations around the world
have complained that unchecked globalisation and the "free trade"
model being pushed by multinational corporations is driving a race to
the bottom in environmental and labour standards. This conflict will
doubtless come to the fore in September when the World Trade
Organisation meets in Cancun, Mexico, where WTO officials hope to
advance a new round of "reforms" that will help corporations invest
wherever they like while avoiding government regulations.
The just-released Cato report, the seventh in an
annual series, should not be confused with the Index of Economic
Freedom published by the Wall Street Journal and the
right-wing Heritage Foundation, although the results are fairly
similar. Like the Cato report, the Index, the most recent
version of which appeared last autumn, rated Hong Kong and Singapore
as the two economies—out of a total of 156—with the greatest economic
freedom.
According to the Cato report, which covers 2001,
the year for which the most comprehensive data is available, economic
freedom has gained ground around the world over the eight-year period
since the first ratings were published for 1995. The average rating
for 2001 stood at 6.35, only slightly higher than the previous year,
but substantially more than the 5.96 eight years ago.
The report’s authors, economists James Gwartney and
Robert Lawson, said the turning point over the past 30 years took
place in 1980—coincidentally, perhaps, the same year that the World
Bank introduced structural adjustment programmes (SAPs), which were
designed to reduce the impact of government on the economy—when
ratings averaged 5.36, according to their calculations. "It has been
on the rise since then," the reporters said. On a 10-point scale, Hong
Kong gained the highest rating for economic freedom at 8.6, closely
followed by Singapore at 8.5, the United States of America at 8.3 and
New Zealand and the United Kingdom, both at 8.2. The five other
nations in the top 10 were Canada, Switzerland, Ireland, Australia,
and the Netherlands.
Although the rankings did not precisely follow
those used in the Wall Street Journal’s Index, seven out of the
10 top nations overlapped the two surveys.