|
President
Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair contend they won’t be
proved wrong in their pre-war claims about Iraq’s weapons
capabilities. Even if they are, says Blair, a menace has been
defeated.
"If we are wrong, we will have
destroyed a threat that at its least is responsible for inhuman
carnage and suffering," Blair said last week in a historic address to
the U. S. Congress. "That is something I am confident history will
forgive."
Bush sounded a similar note when the
two appeared together minutes later in the majestic, marble-floored
entrance hall of the White House.
"Given Saddam’s history of violence
and aggression, it would have been reckless to place our trust in his
sanity or his restraint," Bush said. "As long as I hold this office, I
will never risk the lives of American citizens by assuming the
goodwill of dangerous enemies."
With the carefully orchestrated
statements, the two allies hoped to put to rest days of tough
questioning on both sides of the Atlantic about the intelligence
information they used to justify toppling Saddam Hussein. No weapons
of mass destruction have been found in more than three months since U.
S. A. and British-led coalition ousted Saddam’s government.
Recently, Bush has been under fire
from Democrats for a claim in his January 28 State-of-the-Union
address—based on British intelligence and key to the assertion that
Saddam was reconstituting a nuclear weapons programme—that Iraq sought
to buy uranium in Africa. The White House now says concerns about the
intelligence behind the statement should have kept it out of the
speech.
But the leaders, in lockstep, sought
to refocus the debate away from the daily drip-drip of questions and
on to their joint resolve in the face of danger from terrorists and
weapons of mass destruction.
"Saddam Hussein produced and
possessed chemical and biological weapons, and was trying to
reconstitute his nuclear weapons programme," Bush said.
"We won’t be proven wrong," he
added. "I believe that we will find the truth.... And that’ll end all
this speculation."
And while Blair had opened the door
in his speech to the possibility that weapons of mass destruction may
never be found, Bush did not do so as widely.
"If our critics are wrong, if we are
right, as I believe with every fibre of instinct and conviction I have
that we are, and we do not act, then we will have hesitated in the
face of this menace when we should have given leadership," Blair said
to applause from hundreds of U. S. lawmakers.
Bush was clearly pleased. He called
Blair’s speech to Congress "fabulous," and congratulated his
counterpart with a quiet "good job" as they ended their joint
appearance before reporters.
The two then met upstairs in the
residence for about an hour before leaving the White House together.
Bush went to Texas for a weekend of campaign fund-raising and a visit
to his ranch by Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi, another ally in the
Iraq war.
Blair, the first British Prime
Minister to address a joint meeting of Congress in the U. S. A. since
Margaret Thatcher in 1985, entered the House chamber to thunderous
applause that was repeated throughout his remarks. The warm welcome
—"more than I deserve and more than I’m used to, quite frankly," Blair
noted dryly—was in stark contrast to the heckling over the Iraq war he
often receives in the British Parliament.
It was a speech designed to resonate
uniquely with Blair’s American audience. He joked about the British
torching of the Library of Congress in 1814, saying: "I know this is
kind of late but—sorry," and spoke spiritedly of the meaning of
American freedom.Blair also paid a tribute to America’s superpower
status, but with a gentle plea for the nation to work with others, not
dictate to them. That effort, he said, should start with Europe—even
though many of its major powers opposed the war.
"To be a serious partner, Europe
must take on and defeat the anti-Americanism that sometimes passes for
its political discourse," Blair said. "America must listen as well as
lead."
Bush did not answer directly when
asked whether he would take personal responsibility for his statement
on Iraq’s uranium pursuits. He said only that he would take
responsibility for making the decision to go to war and for "dealing
with that threat." For his part, Blair forcefully defended his
government’s reports. "We stand by that intelligence," he said. Bush
called the remnant Saddam loyalists in Iraq, responsible for
continuing deadly attacks on U. S. soldiers there.The two leaders also
defended the progress of post-war efforts to rebuild Iraq, insisting
it will take time to build democratic institutions and a functioning
society. |