|
Indian Labour
This refers to the eye-opening
article ‘Is Indian Labour Really Cheap’ in The DayAfter dated
June 16-30.
I would like to share my
comments on this subject:
1. Can India really create jobs
for all its surplus labour given that there is no employment policy
worth the name in the subcontinent? Amending the Constitution will not
protect our labour from exploitation.
2. Before amending existing or
enacting new labour statutes, I feel that a review of all existing
schemes is necessary for a proper in depth understanding of why most
of them are ineffective.
3. It is cheaper to go in for
contract or casual labour on the factory floor. I believe there
already exist certain legal restrictions on contract labour and
‘contractors’ who supply such labour have certain obligations to
provide for their labour force.
4. Our biggest mistake was
committed under the Congress rule just after independence when the
focus on labour and employment related areas went awry. For instance,
our earlier population policy (or lack thereof) has seen India become
a country of one billion plus, providing a rich base for unemployment
and corruption as well as stunting growth and development. Our
Five-Year Plans were either directionless or just not adequately
implemented..
5. Is any party ready to bell
the cat in initiating an effective and just human resources
development policy?
Ujjal Ghosh
New Delhi
(The author of the article responds: All the
comments and questions raised by Mr. Ghosh are valid to a lesser or
greater extent. However, my article dwelt principally on the low
productivity of Indian labour and the reasons thereof. Mr. Ghosh has
added to my reasons. Thank you. Dara Nair)
Kudos
The DayAfter
(July 16-31, 2002) is really a collector’s item. You have succeeded in
bringing to life various vignettes of the days gone by. The article
about how the magazine got its name was interesting. May your magazine
grow and prosper and continue to celebrate many anniversaries in the
days to come.
Monica Trivedi
Calcutta
Kashmir
Joginder Singh’s analysis of the
proposal for the trifurcation of Kashmir needs (The DayAfter July
16-31, 2002) serious thought by the intelligentsia of the country. It
has focussed attention on the dangerous practice of continuing to
break up the country into so many pieces. The protagonists of such
theories refuse to see into the future and are only interested in
promoting their own narrow vested interests, that is, to gain power by
hook or crook. They believe that a small piece of the cake is better
than nothing at all. They would be well advised to sit back and think
of the consequences of their folly and what kind of disunited country
they will be leaving for the future generations. Have they not heard
the saying: "United we stand, divided we fall." I sincerely hope
better sense will prevail and thank Joginder Singh for highlighting
the issue.
Mohammad Rauf
Srinagar
Political Frauds
The article by Janak Singh in
The DayAfter (July 16-31, 2002) entitled ‘Focus on Elections, not
Problems’ has hit the nail on the head. Practically every political
party seems to be interested in merely perpetuating its hold and
increasing its voteback rather than on solving the problems that beset
the country at every level. In earlier days, especially before
Independence, those people entered politics who really wanted to serve
the country and its people and the vision that they had and the steps
they took to implement it are there for all to see. What contribution
have modern-day politicians made to the country?
Every day we read in the
newspapers of how they avoid paying their telephone bills, do not pay
the rent for their government accommodation, and misuse government
property and personnel for their own private use. How long will they
be allowed to continue looting the country? It is time they were
exposed for what they are. There are the problems of unemployment,
drinking water, schools, medical facilities and other basic needs of
the common man. Is anyone thinking about them?
It is high time our leaders woke
up the ground realities and really thought in terms of the common man.
Mukesh Sharma
New Delhi |