THE
recent US federal law against outsourcing American support services to
foreign shores has invited a series of protests from sources in the
Indian Government and the Indian corporate sector. Everyone wants to
keep these BPO (business process outsourcing) jobs within India for a
variety of reasons.
The most legitimate and valid concern comes from
the Indian industry that provides almost 70 per cent of existing jobs
through the BPO sector. According to the statistics provided by
www.bpoindia.org, which derives its data from the likes of McKinsey
and Co and The Gartner Group, as on March 31, 2003, the Indian BPO
sector employed 1,71,000 professionals.
It has an investment of $1 billion, creating about
100,000 smart cubicles in 7.5 million square feet of space. It
generated revenues of $2.3 billion in 2002-03.
India has the largest number of English-speaking
college graduates in the world, thanks to its 250-year stint being the
crown jewel of the British Empire.
A large number of young and skilled Indian
citizens, between the age brackets of 21-27, work in the BPO industry
catering to provide support services to foreign firms mainly from the
United Kingdom and the United States.
The three-year-old US recession and the highest
rate of unemployment (8.3 million Americans jobless per US Department
of Labour Statistics as of January 2004) since the Great Depression of
1929 has had the US government hard pressed to act and alleviate some
percentage of this unemployment. Moreover, this law applies to
American companies using government contracts and funds only, for now.
The American private sector is not affected and
companies like IBM, Microsoft and Oracle need not necessarily follow
suit if the people they hire in India are through their own financial
resources. The fear of the law applying across the board and including
these corporations is what propels the Indian BPO sector to react in
the way it has.
The second reason is merely political. Both India
and the United States are in an election year.
In India, the Bharatiya Janata Party-led government
is banking on strong economy at home through foreign investment and
industry to win the general elections. A dent in India's economic
strength at this point could seriously hurt the ruling party's
chances.
In the United States, President George W. Bush and
the Republican Party have been under fire for the war in Iraq. The US
economy is just officially out of recession and the Bush Government
has yet to show a significant employment surge. More jobless Americans
would mean fewer votes for the Republicans. The President is trying
his best in the few months left to the presidential elections in
November 2004 to limit the damage.
So, the BPO sector looked like the weakest spot to
start with because there exists an equally skilled percentage of
people in the United States who can do the job as effectively if not
more, and who are currently jobless. In crying out against the
backlash against the 70 per cent revenue producing BPO industry, the
Indian government and industry have been continuously ignoring the
remaining 30 per cent highly skilled bunch of technically qualified
young Indians.
The neglect has reached a sorry state where
engineering, commerce and arts graduates have been forced to opt for
call centre jobs, simply because there exist little or no opportunity
for these youngsters after professional school.
Since age 22 (on an average) when these kids
graduate, they spend about 3-5 years in the BPO industry trying to
make a living and are quite content with the compensation standards
offered to them bearing in mind the fact that they have skills and
experience limited to what they have learnt in school.
Little attention has been paid to providing an
environment for technological research and development. On the
initiative of the Karnataka government, Microsoft is setting up a
7,000-seat support centre in India to cater to 5.2 million worldwide
users of Windows XP.
India needs a solid infrastructure in the fields of
telecommunications, manufacturing, finance, education and the arts.
The 'Nasscom-McKinsey Study: India IT Strategies' predicts the global
market for IT-enabled services to be over $142 billion by 2008.
Of this, customer interaction services account for
$33 billion, finance & accounting services $15 billion, engineering &
design $1.2 billion, data search, integration & management $44
billion, remote education $18 billion and networking consulting and
management $15 billion, among others. The United States and the likes
would only find it lucrative and economical to invest in India in
these core sectors for many reasons. The primary of them being the
still prevalent lack of highly technical know-how in the US. By having
the R&D outsourced, America stands to gain in monetary terms if global
compensation standards and work environment quality can be duplicated
in India.
Moreover, American and other foreign nationals can
be employed wherever there is a deficit of highly skilled and
experienced Indian labour, on short-term periods, to increase the
global diversity of the workplace and the opportunity to Indians and
foreigners to learn from each other. Learning is a two-way street. You
impart and imbibe knowledge.
To fuel this growth in core infrastructural
industries, India would need more than just a handful of Indian
Institutes of Technology and Indian Institutes of Management. At
present, India has two million candidates for 2,000 student positions
in the IITs every year. Not surprisingly, the graduates of these
premier institutes have been the creme de la creme of India and
the world. The fortunate among the rest of the candidates join other
comparable institutes like BITS (Pilani), Roorkee University, and the
regional engineering colleges, to mention a few. The vast majority of
the remaining candidates find a place in one of the ever-mushrooming
private professional institutes. Foreign educational institutes must
be encouraged to offer on-site distance learning and/or other degree
programmes at a reasonable tuition rate that is commensurate with the
country they target. Collaborations with the IITs and IIMs could be a
very practical beginning to this approach. Success always comes at a
price. But it is better than having an entire generation of skilled
youngsters rusting away their knowledge and spending their energies in
an industry that holds no promise of a future. It is healthy for
India. It is healthy for America.