THE
BJP and the Congress Party are both making a big show of migrations to
their respective folds from other parties, betraying a sense of
nervousness that has gripped them before the Lok Sabha elections. Atal
Behari Vajpayee and Sonia Gandhi know it well that their parties have
absolutely no chance of securing an absolute majority on their own and
may even suffer an erosion in their tally in the dissolved Lok Sabha.
Both, therefore, seem desperate about retaining what they had won in
1999 and, if fortune smiles, expect any improvements. Though Venkaiah
Naidu set a goal of 300 plus for the BJP, Vajpayee is realistic enough
to debunk it by insisting that his party will have to again run a
coalition. The publicity blitz let loose at State expense will not bring
bagfuls of votes to the ruling party’s fold.
The
two main political formations are engaged in a war of attrition with no
holds barred in order to weaken each other. Both are accusing each other
of descending too low while campaigning. The poll-eve migrations by
self-seeking politicians are unlikely to alter the final election
picture, but are a sad commentary on the character of Indian politicians
without scruples, who wear their ideology like a shirt to be changed
every other day. Some of these worthies have hopped from one party to
another in search of personal gain. One begins to wonder whether their
types are fit to grace the august houses of our legislatures. They are
supposed to be the guardians of our democracy and upholders of the
Constitution and the rich traditions passed on by our outstanding past
leaders, some of whom must be turning in their graves over the depravity
characterising our political system.
Arif Mohammad Khan has often hopped from one party to
another to be able to fulfill his mission of protecting the interests of
Muslims and giving them a proper place in the democratic system. The
carrot of a Lok Sabha seat having been dangled before him, Khan believes
that he will now pursue his minorities –protection mission by
associating with the BJP. The ensuing elections will prove how little
clout he enjoys among the Muslims.
After four terms in the Rajya Sabha and Deputy
Chairmanship of the House, Najma Heptulla complains that the Congress
has not given her proper respect. She was carrying on a campaign against
Sonia Gandhi and sending feelers to the BJP that she was prepared to
walkover if another term in the Rajya Sabha was assured for her. To
embarrass the Congress, the Prime Minister broke all political protocol
by publicly inviting Heptullah to join the BJP, which, in effect,
assured her another term. So, Heptullah is breaking her bonds with the
Congress and becoming a BJP crusader.
Similarly, after changing several parties, Maneka
Gandhi, along with her son Varun, has now come to BJP to seek a ticket
and get back to the Lok Sabha. She had said many unsavoury things about
Vajpayee and the BJP when she was dropped from the Cabinet. After being
rewarded with the chairmanship of several bodies, music director Bhupen
Hazarika was not expected to say anything other than praising the
government and the ruling party, which he has now formally joined, and
which assures him patronage for many more years. He will be mistaken in
believing that he can sing his way into the hearts of the Assamese
voters to make them vote for the BJP. P.A. Sangma also continues to
suffer from delusions of grandeur, even after the rout of his party in
the last round of Assembly elections in Meghalaya. He has even parted
company with Sharad Pawar to fulfill the assurances given by him to the
BJP leaders that he would fight the Congress at any cost.
Not to be left behind, the Congress Party too has
invited migrations in order to boost its fortunes. It managed to enroll
11 MLAs of the All India Progressive Janata Dal in Karnataka in order to
give a boost to the party prospects, now that Chief Minister S. M.
Krishna has dissolved the Assembly and his office is at stake. The
Congress claimed another prize catch by admitting a prominent Shiv Sena
leader Balasaheb Vikhe Patil into its fold. This amounts to a personal
setback to Bal Thackeray. With the demand for a separate Vidarbha State
petering out and the split in the Shiv Sena, the Congress-NCP alliance,
with the expected inclusion of several groups of the Republican Party,
is set to acquire an edge over the BJP-Sena combine. The Lok Janshakti
Party leader Ram Vilas Paswan conceded to an alliance with ruling RJD in
Bihar and, along with the Congress, can effectively counter the
BJP-Samata alliance. Laloo Prasad Yadav is also mediating between the
Congress and the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha for seat sharing in Jharkhand.
The BJP realised its folly in admitting D. P. Yadav, who has a criminal
background, to help in the campaign in UP. But the public outcry against
the "purification" of Yadav by joining the "sacred" BJP stream forced
the leadership to unceremoniously drop him. Those, including Vankaiah
Naidu, who had sung lyrics in Yadav’s praise at the televised initiation
ceremony saw nothing wrong in first honouring and then dishonouring him
in public.
Both parties are, as usual, out to woo the Muslims
who have shunned them and taken shelter under regional outfits, such as,
SP, BSP, and Telugu Desam Party to ensure their security and well-being.
Despite rootless leaders like Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi and Shahnawaz Khan
supporting the Sangh Parivar’s Ayodhya temple agitation and, at the same
time, extolling the virtues of the BJP, Muslims have, by and large, kept
away from the party. Their distance from the BJP has increased after the
Gujarat carnage and they are unlikely to flock to its camp in the next
election. They have discovered that Vajpayee keeps reiterating that the
temple remains very much on the BJP’s agenda, which he was not able to
implement because he was bound by the NDA’s common minimum programme.
The Party’s spokesmen insist that the peace initiative with Pakistan
would influence the mind of the Muslim voters and make them gravitate to
it. There are nearly 100 constituencies where Muslims constitute 10 to
20 per cent of the vote and the BJP cannot afford to ignore them. The
Party is supported also by the Sangh Parivar in its quest for Muslim
votes for the simple reason that it wants the present dispensation to
continue for another five years.
Indeed, normalisation of relations with Pakistan is
in the country’s interest and not Muslim interest. As Kamal Faroqui,
member, Muslim Personal Law Board, argues that the BJP’s attitude to
Muslims sends out wrong signals. "Does it mean that if Indo-Pak
relations deteriorate, Hindu-Muslim ties in India will also plunge? "He
does not think that the Prime Minister is sincere about the Muslim vote.
The attempt is to get the secular Hindu vote by projecting the BJP as a
party acceptable to Muslims as well. Ahmed Patel of the Congress points
out that a logical conclusion of the Prime Minister’s professed love and
compassion for the Muslims should have been an immediate action against
Narendra Modi after the Gujarat police was indicted by the Supreme Court
in the rape and riot cases. How does the BJP expect the Muslims to shed
fear of the Party?
Another opportunistic move by Mulayam Singh Yadav
ordering all schools closed at noon on Fridays to enable Muslim teachers
and students to offer Namaz was so patently communal that Muslim
leaders were first to condemn it. He was trying to project himself as
the epitome of secularism and sole protector of Muslim interests and
sentiments. He was reminded that the move would be detrimental to Muslim
interests and further isolate them from the Hindus. Realising that the
move would not get him any votes, Yadav quickly cancelled the order. The
unfortunate part is that Muslims, who constitute over 12 per cent of the
country’s population, lack sincere and honest leadership. The vacuum
left by the lack of enlightened leadership has been partly filled by
religious zealots, who have concerned themselves solely with protecting
the religious rights of the Muslims, without bothering about improving
their economic, educational and social status in a composite society.
Their so-called leaders have attached themselves to
parties without discrimination for personal gains, thereby jeopardising
the larger interests of the community. The entire Muslim community is
sought to be put in the dock over the Babri Masjid-Ram temple issue for
disregarding the sentiments of the majority community. And yet, when the
election comes, concerted moves are made to get their votes by promising
them the moon. The Sangh Parivar projects the so-called Muslim leaders
in the BJP fold as proof of the party’s secularism, as show-pieces
catapulted to Parliament with Hindu support.
There is so much talk of the "feel good" factor and
"India shining", but Muslims, by and large, have not benefited from
whatever little economic progress the country has achieved, nor have,
for that matter the Dalits, the backward communities and Scheduled
Castes and Scheduled Tribes, despite their political exploitation by the
likes of Mulayam Singh Yadav, Mayawati, Chandrababu Naidu and
Jayalalithaa. The feel good factor has increased social inequalities and
economic disparities and only introduced the "mall culture" among a mere
10 per cent of the population, which today consumes more than it did
earlier – clothing, food, cars, TVs and refrigerators. The rest 90 per
cent remain unaffected and the living standards of 30 per cent of the
population have actually depreciated due to the population pressures and
broken down social services.
Even when the Planning Commission fudges the poverty
figures, it does not take into account items of social consumption, such
as, education, health, shelter, drinking water, sanitation and
gender-based disadvantages. According to official surveys, more than 260
million Indians still go to sleep hungry every night. The leaders are
entitled to feel good, because they are insensitive to people’s pain and
suffering. Their sole concern is to somehow drag the poor and the hungry
to the polling both and help parties return to power on promise of a
bright, hunger and disease-free tomorrow.