IT
may be too early to say so, but thanks to the robust growth in
agriculture, the end of the fourth quarters on March 31, 2004 is most
likely to witness another 0.50 to 1.00 per cent growth over and above
the 8.1 per cent growth projected by the Central Statistical
Organisation (CSO).
We have only the end of the second quarter (up to
September 30) figures with us and the CSO itself has said in a press
release that the third quarter (Q3) figures till December 31 would be
available only by March 31. This means that the Q3 figures would take
into account the kharif harvest only. Paddy, which is the main kharif
crop, is harvested in most of the country except Punjab and maybe
Haryana, between October 1 and December 1, and in some states even
later. Along with paddy, jute, sugarcane, a host of kharif pulses,
including arhar and mung, are harvested in the kharif season. So are
groundnut and some other oilseeds.
However, the value of these harvests were not taken
into account, obviously, while formulating the Q-2 estimates. The Q-3
figures will include the value of these farm produce. Even then, the
estimates will not include the value of the rabi harvests in their
totality. While mustard and gram, the main non-wheat rabi crops, are
harvested by March 31 almost everywhere in India, wheat harvesting
takes place mainly in April and May. The value to the wheat harvests
will, therefore go to constitute the estimates for Q-1 of 2004-05.
On that, one may add here that the area under wheat
this year (rabi 2003-04) has gone up from a low of 24.40 million
hectares to as much as 27.10 million hectares, higher even than the
normal area of 26.6 million tonnes. Even with a comparative low
average of three tonnes per hectare, the production will be around 80
million tonnes, the highest ever so far.
If the average price at which wheat is likely to be
sold is taken at Rs 640 per quintal or Rs 6400 per tonnes, the value
of wheat harvest alone will be Rs 512 billion (Rs 51200 crore).
In the year 1988-89, the GDP growth had registered
a 10.1 per cent growth. The reason for this was obviously the
bountiful rains during the 1988 monsoon------the highest during the
20th century following the 1987 drought, the worst drought of the last
century. The juxtaposition of these two natural events gave the
unprecedented boost to the GDP figures on 1988-89.
In fact, a similar situation would have arised in
2003-2004 too, following the year of the disastrous drought of
2002-03. Unfortunately, the south-west monsoon of 2003 was not as
bountiful as the one of 1988, when almost no region of the country was
untouched by the blessings of the rain god. This year, according to
the Meteorological Department, as many as 62 of the nearly 500
districts of the country had received deficient rainfall for the
second year in succession during monsoon 2003. This drought has
resulted in widespread loss of crops both during the kharif and rabi
seasons. Among those districts are four in Maharashtra, 16 in
Karnataka, nine in Tamil Nadu and five in Kerala.
These facts strengthen the views held by economists
across their ideological divide that agriculture is still key to the
fulfillment of the "dream" of "Mungeri Lal" to see India a developed
nation before even 2020. If only agriculture earns a larger percentage
of the GDP than the present 24 to 25 per cent and this is not very
difficult – "Hon Mr. Mungeri Lal", as Finance Minister Jaswant Singh
sought to describe the common man, will certainly see much better days
in the coming years.