Home | National | States | International | Business | Cover Story | Sports | Hot Tips | Third Eye

 
   Flash News        

Flash News

New Delhi: Park Or Parking

Orissa: No Rewards For Forest Protection

Others
Media Pulse

Using news as a weapon

Water is also politics

Indian scientists helping U. S. defence programme

The Unique teachings of Eriyon Shri Upaguruji

Focus: Pandya’s ghastly murder brings BJP dissidents to the fore

Jammu And Kashmir:
Healing Tough Must Continue
 
by Brij Bhardwaj
 
The killing provoked a hurdle not only in Jammu province but also in Kashmir and all groups, irrespective of their political affiliation, condemned the incident with one voice.
 

The Jammu and Kashmir Government has, for the time being, been able to persuade the Kashmiri Pandits not to leave the Valley en masse after the brutal killing of men, women and children at Nandimarg. The persuasion was not difficult as the members of the community were suitably touched by the sympathy and support given to them by their neighbours after the incident. The manner in which the majority expressed its solidarity with the minority and dislike of the militants responsible for the killing clearly indicated that the militants may be able to kill innocents living in far-flung villages but they were losing the battle for the minds and the hearts of the Kashmiris.

The killing provoked a hurdle not only in Jammu province but also in Kashmir and all groups, irrespective of their political affiliation, condemned the incident with one voice. It is no more a matter of satisfaction for anyone as the cause for which militants were fighting in the past has been taken up by others who are equally opposed to attacks on any section of the Valley and would like to provide a healing touch for the majority as well as the minority community. It is in this spirit that Mehbooba Mufti went to parts of Uttar Pradesh and Mumbai when some Kashmiri students were subjected to harassment by the police. The protection of a few thousand Kashmiri Pandits who remain in the Valley after a major section of them have migrated should be a matter of honour and commitment for the new government as otherwise its secular credentials will come under scrutiny.

The major problem is not that militants chose to attack the minority living in a far-flung village, but the fact that the attack became possible only because the policemen posted in the area chose to be silent spectators instead of doing their duty. According to reports, the militants were able to neutralise the policemen without firing a single bullet either through bribery or through persuasion. In either case, it raises important questions about the ability of the government to govern or provide security for the people. If those who are posted to guard become mute spectators, the battle will be lost even before it has begun.

When the new government took office, it decided to disband the Special Operations Group of the State police which had been set up to deal with militants. The group had acquired a bad reputation for alleged excesses committed by it while dealing with suspected militants. But the State Government while disbanding this outfit did not create an alternative formation to deal with militancy as it wanted to leave the matter to the State police. The ability of the police to do this job has become doubtful after this incident and the State Government will have to do more to restore the confidence of the common people in the ability and commitment of the State police to fight militants.

The need for creating a special force arose in the first place because there were doubts about the ability of the State police to do the job. These doubts had arisen in the wake of a virtual revolt by the State police. In the present case, the credentials of the police have become even more suspect as it had failed to perform its duty and thus violated its oath of office. Mere suspension will not meet the ends of justice, as the government has to ensure that the police acts and works as an instrument of the State under its orders. It is high time that a thorough scrutiny is undertaken to weed out suspected elements and also check their resolve to fight the militants. In this context, the Centre will also have to play its role. The Union Home Ministry which virtually gave a free hand to the previous State government headed by Dr. Farooq Abdullah has been watching the actions of the present regime like a hawk. It must move forward and extend its help and hand of friendship to the State government as the problem of Jammu and Kashmir is a national one and cannot be tackled by any State government on its own. More so, the task of checking infiltration from across the border is the job of the Union Government and unless they are able to do it, the State will be rocked by many more incidents like the one earlier this month.

There is also need to differentiate between the healing touch adopted by the State Government by releasing those persons against whom no cases had been made out after a long period of detention and dealing with hard-core militants. Such a policy is an essential tool of any anti-insurgency policy and the Government of India can be no exception. Jammu and Kashmir has remained a complex problem and there can be no easy solutions. More so, as the Pakistan government has been encouraged to fish again in troubled waters, thanks to the pre-occupation of the world powers with Iraq. Under the circumstances, India has no option but to deal with it with its own resources and skills as very little help can be expected from the world powers.

India, however, holds some trump cards which can be used to bring about a change in Kashmir. For instance, the present Government has come into power after having won an election which, by all accounts, has been described as fair and impartial. The party in power is also willing to mobilise public opinion in favour of fighting terrorism and has received substantial support in its efforts. The Government of India can play a useful role by opening up a dialogue with all sections of people willing to work for a peaceful solution. In this connection, the appointment of N. N. Vohra as the interlocutor is the first step; it has to be followed up by giving a broad mandate to him to hold dialogue with all sections of opinion and not limiting him to holding talks with the elected representatives only. Some changes are being contemplated like strengthening of border patrols, posting of more forces to check infiltration which is likely to grow in the days to come when the mountain passes become easy to negotiate with the melting of snow, but steps on the law and order front will not solve the problem. Simultaneous action will also have to be taken to open new avenues of employment. It is no secret that the Valley has no industry worth the name and tourism, which in the past offered gainful jobs, is in a bad shape as violence is keeping visitors away. The argument over why tourists are not visiting Kashmir when Israel continues to receive a large number of visitors despite violence has no relevance as tourism is for pleasure and not for endangering one’s life. In summing up, the obvious answer is that the Centre and the State need to collaborate to find a solution to the problems in a troubled State like Jammu and Kashmir. No single incident should shake our faith in the basic policy of dealing with our own people through negotiations and talks while using a strong hammer against foreign militants. The holding of free elections in the State and installation of a democratic government has given us a powerful weapon.

TOP


Editor's Page | Interview | Open House | Hot Tips |Business | News Makers | Sports
Society & Health | Silver Screen |Cover Story | Subscription | Advertising | Archives
National |International