he
Jammu and Kashmir Government has, for the time being, been able to
persuade the Kashmiri Pandits not to leave the Valley en masse after
the brutal killing of men, women and children at Nandimarg. The
persuasion was not difficult as the members of the community were
suitably touched by the sympathy and support given to them by their
neighbours after the incident. The manner in which the majority
expressed its solidarity with the minority and dislike of the
militants responsible for the killing clearly indicated that the
militants may be able to kill innocents living in far-flung villages
but they were losing the battle for the minds and the hearts of the
Kashmiris.
The killing provoked a hurdle not only in Jammu
province but also in Kashmir and all groups, irrespective of their
political affiliation, condemned the incident with one voice. It is
no more a matter of satisfaction for anyone as the cause for which
militants were fighting in the past has been taken up by others who
are equally opposed to attacks on any section of the Valley and
would like to provide a healing touch for the majority as well as
the minority community. It is in this spirit that Mehbooba Mufti
went to parts of Uttar Pradesh and Mumbai when some Kashmiri
students were subjected to harassment by the police. The protection
of a few thousand Kashmiri Pandits who remain in the Valley after a
major section of them have migrated should be a matter of honour and
commitment for the new government as otherwise its secular
credentials will come under scrutiny.
The major problem is not that militants chose to
attack the minority living in a far-flung village, but the fact that
the attack became possible only because the policemen posted in the
area chose to be silent spectators instead of doing their duty.
According to reports, the militants were able to neutralise the
policemen without firing a single bullet either through bribery or
through persuasion. In either case, it raises important questions
about the ability of the government to govern or provide security
for the people. If those who are posted to guard become mute
spectators, the battle will be lost even before it has begun.
When the new government took office, it decided
to disband the Special Operations Group of the State police which
had been set up to deal with militants. The group had acquired a bad
reputation for alleged excesses committed by it while dealing with
suspected militants. But the State Government while disbanding this
outfit did not create an alternative formation to deal with
militancy as it wanted to leave the matter to the State police. The
ability of the police to do this job has become doubtful after this
incident and the State Government will have to do more to restore
the confidence of the common people in the ability and commitment of
the State police to fight militants.
The need for creating a special force arose in
the first place because there were doubts about the ability of the
State police to do the job. These doubts had arisen in the wake of a
virtual revolt by the State police. In the present case, the
credentials of the police have become even more suspect as it had
failed to perform its duty and thus violated its oath of office.
Mere suspension will not meet the ends of justice, as the government
has to ensure that the police acts and works as an instrument of the
State under its orders. It is high time that a thorough scrutiny is
undertaken to weed out suspected elements and also check their
resolve to fight the militants. In this context, the Centre will
also have to play its role. The Union Home Ministry which virtually
gave a free hand to the previous State government headed by Dr.
Farooq Abdullah has been watching the actions of the present regime
like a hawk. It must move forward and extend its help and hand of
friendship to the State government as the problem of Jammu and
Kashmir is a national one and cannot be tackled by any State
government on its own. More so, the task of checking infiltration
from across the border is the job of the Union Government and unless
they are able to do it, the State will be rocked by many more
incidents like the one earlier this month.
There is also need to differentiate between the
healing touch adopted by the State Government by releasing those
persons against whom no cases had been made out after a long period
of detention and dealing with hard-core militants. Such a policy is
an essential tool of any anti-insurgency policy and the Government
of India can be no exception. Jammu and Kashmir has remained a
complex problem and there can be no easy solutions. More so, as the
Pakistan government has been encouraged to fish again in troubled
waters, thanks to the pre-occupation of the world powers with Iraq.
Under the circumstances, India has no option but to deal with it
with its own resources and skills as very little help can be
expected from the world powers.
India, however, holds some trump cards which can
be used to bring about a change in Kashmir. For instance, the
present Government has come into power after having won an election
which, by all accounts, has been described as fair and impartial.
The party in power is also willing to mobilise public opinion in
favour of fighting terrorism and has received substantial support in
its efforts. The Government of India can play a useful role by
opening up a dialogue with all sections of people willing to work
for a peaceful solution. In this connection, the appointment of N.
N. Vohra as the interlocutor is the first step; it has to be
followed up by giving a broad mandate to him to hold dialogue with
all sections of opinion and not limiting him to holding talks with
the elected representatives only. Some changes are being
contemplated like strengthening of border patrols, posting of more
forces to check infiltration which is likely to grow in the days to
come when the mountain passes become easy to negotiate with the
melting of snow, but steps on the law and order front will not solve
the problem. Simultaneous action will also have to be taken to open
new avenues of employment. It is no secret that the Valley has no
industry worth the name and tourism, which in the past offered
gainful jobs, is in a bad shape as violence is keeping visitors
away. The argument over why tourists are not visiting Kashmir when
Israel continues to receive a large number of visitors despite
violence has no relevance as tourism is for pleasure and not for
endangering one’s life. In summing up, the obvious answer is that
the Centre and the State need to collaborate to find a solution to
the problems in a troubled State like Jammu and Kashmir. No single
incident should shake our faith in the basic policy of dealing with
our own people through negotiations and talks while using a strong
hammer against foreign militants. The holding of free elections in
the State and installation of a democratic government has given us a
powerful weapon.