India’s Prime Minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, has
com-pleted five years in power, heading the 22-party coalition
government since 1998. Surprisingly, Vajpayee’s approval ratings remain
high in the country although the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).to which
he belongs seems to be losing ground. The BJP’s defeat in the State
Assembly elections held in Himachal Pradesh recently, despite the fact
that the party had sought to communalise the polls, just as it had done
in Gujarat, is a pointer to the shape of things to come. The general
elections are due to be held next year but it is becoming clear that
mere communal slogans or the talk of the Ram temple in Ayodhya, which
had catapulted the party from two to more than 180 seats in the Lok
Sabha, are not going to help any more. Had they been potent winners, the
BJP would not have lost the Himachal polls.
Actually, the Indian polity is in a state of flux
largely on account of the fact that the Congress, which used to be a
very secular organisation in the past, has started rediscovering the
Hindutva appeal. Cow protection slogans, which were the monopoly of the
Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and other organisations aligned to the BJP,
are now being raised even by the Congress. The party Chief Minister in
Madhya Pradesh, Digvijay Singh, fearing a Hindu backlash in the polls
due to be held in his State in November this year, is demanding a ban on
cow slaughter. The Congress spokesmen in New Delhi are asserting that
the BJP cannot arrogate to itself the right of representing the majority
Hindu community and fighting for its concerns. Having been in the
political wilderness for long, the Congress seems to be bending over
backwards now to project itself as a Hindutva devotee in the hope of
regaining power. And now it has won the Himachal Assembly election.
But all along the Congress had been a secular
organisation, always expressing as much concern for causes dear to the
minority communities as to the overwhelming number of the Hindu
electorate in the country. In spite of that, the Congress had remained
in power for long. But the situation has changed now. The depressed
classes, constituting a sizeable chunk of the country’s population, and
the minorities, no longer seem to trust the Congress as they did in the
past. Actually, the depressed classes have now thrown up their own
leaders who have separate parties and wield considerable influence in
certain States. For instance, the Mayawati-Kanshiram led Bahujan Samaj
Party (BSP) commanding the loyalty of the depressed classes and a
section of the Muslim minority is so powerful now that it seems
difficult to remove her from power. She is the Chief Minister of Uttar
Pradesh but even at the national level, she is a figure to be reckoned
with by both Congress and BJP leaders. Many of the backward castes who
were earlier supporting the Congress are now with the BSP.
Similarly, the Muslim minority, accounting for more
than 15 per cent of the country’s population, used to regard the
Congress as its safeguard. But the bulk of Muslims have now also
deserted the Congress and are aligned either with the BSP or regional
outfits like the Samajwadi Party led by Mulayam Singh Yadav in Uttar
Pradesh or the Rashtriya Janata Dal headed by Laloo Yadav in Bihar. Not
only that, Muslim leaders are also toying with the idea of establishing
their own separate organisation to fight the coming elections. They are
not happy with the BJP because its leaders had a role to play in the
demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya in 1992. Nor are they happy
with the Congress on the ground that the then Central Government, which
was headed by P. V. Narasimha Rao, did nothing to stop the demolition of
the mosque. Even more important is the lesson they have drawn from the
communal carnage last year in Gujarat in which the minority community in
the State was the worst sufferer. No wonder, having lost the sympathy
and support of the bulk of the lower castes and the Muslim minority, the
Congress no longer has such a widespread support base as it had in the
past. For regaining power, the party virtually has no option but to seek
the support of the Hindu electorate which constitutes the overwhelming
majority of the population in the country. The Congress change of stance
poses a challenge to the BJP. Of course, the BJP could win easily in
Gujarat because the Hindus feared the communal beast unleashed by
fanatics deriving support from cross border organisations operating from
Pakistan. Had there been no Godhra carnage, which had claimed the lives
of many karsevaks returning from Ayodhya, perhaps the political scenario
in Gujarat would have been different. The BJP could win Gujarat because
of a near total communal split in the State. Since there was no such
thing in Himachal Pradesh, the party suffered a humiliating defeat even
after raising communal slogans.
The Congress party, which unleashed propaganda to
project itself as much a votary of Hindutva as the BJP and also drew
attention to the failure of the BJP government to solve the problems of
the people in the State, won a convincing victory in Himachal Pradesh.
The message of the elections was: voters cannot be taken for a ride and
unless they perceive a real threat to their life and property they are
not going to be swayed by slogans or religious mumbo-jumbo howsoever
emotional or mind-boggling it may be. In fact, the election results in
Himachal served to revive hopes that the secular image of India,
although impaired now and then by communal violence often instigated by
agent provocateurs deriving inspiration for their diabolical deeds from
the widespread ISI network, remains safe and intact. Although the BJP
leaders have sought to blame internal organisational wrangling for their
defeat, the fact that is the performance of the government counts
largely in determining the outcome of the polls. But Prime Minister Atal
Bihari Vajpayee and other BJP leaders, instead of seeing the Himachal
verdict as a warning, are inclined to regard it as a failure of their
party to put up a united front. May be a couple of more electoral
setbacks would make them see the writing on the wall. Of course, the
performance of the BJP government in Gujarat before the last Assembly
elections was by no means exemplary, yet the party won. Actually, the
government performance issue was relegated to the background by the
communal beast which had ignited the fuse for large-scale devastation in
the State. If the majority of people voted overwhelmingly for the BJP in
the Assembly election in Gujarat despite the lacklustre performance of
its government in the State, it was mainly because they were worried
about their own safety and had come to realise that only a BJP
government could protect them. There was no such bugbear in Himachal
Pradesh and no wonder the electorate turned their back on the party
which sought to exploit them by raising religious slogans.
In the rapidly changing political scenario, the two
major political organisations in the country—the Bharatiya Janata Party
and the Congress Party—are also refashioning their slogans so that they
appeal to the majority Hindu community electorate, which still holds the
key to power in India. To what extent the BJP and the Congress succeed
in claiming the support of the Hindu electorate will, in the coming
days, determine their prospects of ruling India, along with the support
of the small organisations, just as is the case now. The Vajpayee-led
coalition, although it consists of over 184 BJP MPs, is ruling the
country mainly because it has been able to garner the support of smaller
outfits in the Lok Sabha. Although it is rather too early to predict the
outcome of the general elections due to be held in India in 2004,
indications are that coalitions are going to emerge again as powerful
outfits in ruling the country.