|
|
| |
JHARKHAND POLITICS
This
refers to the political activities in Jharkhand which have become a
usual feature of State politics in India. The permanent way to end
horse-trading in State assemblies is to elect Chief Ministers,
Speakers and Deputy Speakers through absolute majority by secret vote
on nominations signed by at least one-third of the MLAs with the
ministerial strength limited to a maximum of one-third of the
Assembly-strength. Such an elected Chief Minister may only be removed
by secret vote on a no-confidence motion signed by at least one-third
MLAs with compulsion of voting for the successive Chief Minister in
the same motion.
Such modifications will abolish
the supremacy of big party bosses who are responsible for the costly
and unholy game of making and unmaking of governments inducing a
pleasant era of full Assembly terms and more stable governments with
much reduced legislative expenses. Such elected Chief Ministers will
have the confidence of all the MLAs irrespective of party-affiliations
like our present Vice President Bhairon Singh Shekhawat who got votes
cutting across party lines in his election! Since selfish political
leaders will never like losing their undesired supremacy, it is for
the Election Commission and the Supreme Court to find ways to
implement such reforms of national and public interest.
Madhu Agrawal
Delhi
Saddam Husain
Your placing of Saddam Husain on
the cover (The DayAfter, March 16-13, 2003) was most
appropriate. Even as he is battling the might of the United States of
America, you have correctly highlighted the odds he is facing. If he
is a tyrant, his people must rise against him and overthrow him, as in
the case with dictators in the past. If he is harbouring terrorists,
the terrorists should be caught and put to death. But no country has
the right to dictate to another who its ruler should be. This is
unfair and smacks of high-handedness. After the break up of the USSR,
which used to keep the USA in check, America has begun riding the high
horse and thinking that it owns the world. Who has given it this
right?
Suchitra Menon
Kochy
Narasimha Rao
In his frank interview (The
DayAfter, March 16-13, 2003), former Prime Minister Narasimha Rao
has stated that secularism is the best course for India to follow.
This is hitting the nail on the head. A vast country like ours, with
diverse faiths and religious communities can be nothing else but
secular if it is to remain united.
The votaries of Hindutva are
playing a dangerous game and whipping up communal passions to seek
votes and foster their own vested interests. They talk of Hindutva but
will not give a single paisa to a beggar who is starving. They will
give lakhs of ill-earned money to a temple, as if seeking pardon from
God, but will not build a shelter for the millions who live just under
the stars. Only some dedicated Hindus observe charity, which is the
main plank of any religion. We talk of protecting the cows, but see
the plight of thousands of cows that stalk the roads, hungry, sick and
injured. Does anyone do anything for them? We go to a mandir, give the
pujari hundreds of rupees to intercede on our behalf with the gods to
ensure that we earn more money. But we will not give a rupee to the
beggar outside. We should stop this hypocrisy about Hindutva and get
down to behaving like real Hindus and ignore the politicians and
rabble-rousers for whom Hinduism is just a vote-getter.
Mukesh Anand
New Delhi |
|